1 resultado para decision make
Filtro por publicador
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (18)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (25)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (7)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (9)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (4)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (68)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (5)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (48)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (5)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Georgian Library Association, Georgia (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (16)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (81)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (190)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (5)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (6)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (14)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (4)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Almería (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (4)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (59)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (23)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (15)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade do Minho (23)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (185)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (66)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (2)
Resumo:
Diagnostic errors are responsible for a significant number of adverse events. Logical reasoning and good decision-making skills are key factors in reducing such errors, but little emphasis has traditionally been placed on how these thought processes occur, and how errors could be minimised. In this article, we explore key cognitive ideas that underpin clinical decision making and suggest that by employing some simple strategies, physicians might be better able to understand how they make decisions and how the process might be optimised.