Identification of potentially pathogenic variants in candidate breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in BRCAX patients

Mutations within the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes account for approximately 20% of hereditary breast cancers, with a further 10%–15% being attributable to rare mutations in moderate-risk genes and common variants in low-risk genes. The genes harbouring mutations in the remaining ∼65% of hereditary breast cancers are unknown. The identification of mutation carriers in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (hboc) families is critical for determining who is most at risk of developing the disease and therefore who should be offered risk-reducing procedures or more intensive screening, or both.

Many of the high- and moderate-risk genes for hereditary breast cancers encode proteins that work in concert to maintain genomic stability and in dna damage signalling and repair. A novel BRCA1 protein complex identified within the research group whose target genes are involved in dna repair provided novel candidates for hboc susceptibility genes. These 12 candidate genes were sequenced in a cohort of 675 affected individuals from the Kathleen Cunningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer (kConFab) with hereditary breast or ovarian cancer, but with no mutations in known susceptibility genes (BRCAx patients). This analysis identified 20 individuals (each from a different BRCAx family) with different potentially pathogenic variants across 6 of the candidate hboc susceptibility genes. The family members of each BRCAx index case were tested for the presence of the specific mutation identified in the proband to examine segregation with disease. To further expand on the potential role of the novel candidate hboc susceptibility genes identified in this study, the genetic variation of a second cohort of 520 Northern Irish BRCAx patients is being characterized using a 61-gene panel.

An Assessment of Psychological Need in Emergency Medical Staff in the Northern Health and Social Care Trust Area

Setting: Psychological stress is increasingly recognised within emergency medicine, given the environmental and clinical stressors associated with the specialism. The current study assessed whether psychological distress is experienced by emergency medical staff and if so, what is the expressed need within this population? Participants: Participants included ambulance personnel, nursing staff, doctors and ancillary support staff within two Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments and twelve ambulance bases within one Trust locality in NI (N = 107). Primary and secondary outcome measures: The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12, Goldberg, 1972, 1978), Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale (STSS, Bride, 2004) and an assessment of need questionnaire were completed and explored using mixed method analysis. Results: Results showed elevated levels of psychological distress within each profession except ambulance service clinical support officers (CSOs). Elevated levels of secondary trauma symptomatology were also found; the highest were within some nursing grades and junior doctors. Decreased enjoyment in job over time was significantly associated with higher scores. Analysis of qualitative data identified sources of stress to include low morale. A total of 65% of participants thought that work related stressors had negatively affected their mental health. Participants explored what they felt could decrease psychological distress including improved resources and psychoeducation. Conclusion: There were elevated levels of distress and secondary traumatic stress within this population as well as an expressed level of need, on both systemic and support levels.

The influence of mobility on mental health status in young people: The role of area-level deprivation

Residential mobility during childhood has been previously associated with poor mental health; however, this association could be mediated by several aspects of moving. This paper investigated the impact of mobility across different levels of area deprivation on the individual’s mental health status in Northern Ireland. Mobility towards deprived areas was associated with an elevated risk of reporting poor mental health in both house owners and renters. However, the number of residential moves appeared to be moderating the effect of area change on the individual’s mental health. Further exploration of this relationship is warranted through the use of more in-depth mental health measures