1 resultado para Thinking Processes
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (3)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (2)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (6)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (41)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (13)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (3)
- Brock University, Canada (23)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (21)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (22)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (94)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (6)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (144)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (5)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (34)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (4)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (18)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (38)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (8)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (24)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (8)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (8)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (41)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (36)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (28)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (16)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (4)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (8)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (11)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (153)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (30)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (90)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (12)
Resumo:
Diagnostic errors are responsible for a significant number of adverse events. Logical reasoning and good decision-making skills are key factors in reducing such errors, but little emphasis has traditionally been placed on how these thought processes occur, and how errors could be minimised. In this article, we explore key cognitive ideas that underpin clinical decision making and suggest that by employing some simple strategies, physicians might be better able to understand how they make decisions and how the process might be optimised.