Fasciola hepatica:development of monoclonal antibodies against somatic antigens and their characterization by ultrastructural localization of antibody binding

A series of monoclonal antibodies was prepared against tegumental and internal antigens of Fasciola hepatica by immunizing mice with whole adult-fluke homogenates prior to harvesting the splenic lymphocytes for fusion. Preliminary screening by the Indirect Fluorescent Antibody technique indicated the occurrence of discrete groups of monoclonals differing from one another in tissue-specificity but within which IFA labelling patterns were fairly consistent. Representative hybridomas for 5 of these groups were stabilized and used to produce ascites fluid in mice. By application of an immunogold labelling technique it was possible to map the distribution of antigens for which each monoclonal antibody had affinity throughout the tissues of 4-week and 12-week flukes. Several monoclonals specifically labelled antigenic determinants on the important tegumental antigen T1. However the distribution of gold colloid labelling suggested that epitopes other than that normally exposed to the infected host were recognized; and several monoclonals specifically attached to T1 antigen in the tegument of juvenile worms only. The glycocalyx of the gut and excretory system of flukes shared T1 antigenicity with the tegument. Monoclonal antibodies were produced against an internal immunogen associated with ribosomes and heterochromatin in active protein-producing cells, and against interstitial material of adult flukes. Monoclonals against antigens in parenchymal cell cytoplasm and in mature vitelline cells were recognized but the corresponding hybridomas were not stabilized.

NSUN4 Is a Dual Function Mitochondrial Protein Required for Both Methylation of 12S rRNA and Coordination of Mitoribosomal Assembly

Biogenesis of mammalian mitochondrial ribosomes requires a concerted maturation of both the small (SSU) and large subunit (LSU). We demonstrate here that the m(5)C methyltransferase NSUN4, which forms a complex with MTERF4, is essential in mitochondrial ribosomal biogenesis as mitochondrial translation is abolished in conditional Nsun4 mouse knockouts. Deep sequencing of bisulfite-treated RNA shows that NSUN4 methylates cytosine 911 in 12S rRNA (m5C911) of the SSU. Surprisingly, NSUN4 does not need MTERF4 to generate this modification. Instead, the NSUN4/MTERF4 complex is required to assemble the SSU and LSU to form a monosome. NSUN4 is thus a dual function protein, which on the one hand is needed for 12S rRNA methylation and, on the other hand interacts with MTERF4 to facilitate monosome assembly. The presented data suggest that NSUN4 has a key role in controlling a final step in ribosome biogenesis to ensure that only the mature SSU and LSU are assembled.

Investigation of the mechanism of repression of rRNA synthesis by an anticancer drug

Ribosome biogenesis is a fundamental cellular process which is tightly regulated in normal cells. A number of tumour suppressors and oncogenes could affect the production of ribosomes at different levels and an upregulation could lead to increased protein biosynthesis which is one of the characteristic features of all cancer cells. Ribosome biogenesis is a very complex process which requires coordinated transcription by all three nucleolar polymerases and the first event in this process is synthesis of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) by RNA Polymerase I (Pol I). Importantly, recent data has pictured rRNA transcription as a key regulator of whole ribosome biogenesis and therefore makes it a valid and very attractive target for anticancer therapy, as well as a perspective biomarker. However, at the moment there is only one known specific inhibitor of Pol I transcription (at stage one of clinical trials) and this makes it very difficult for the development of drugs which would target rRNA transcription and consequently ribosome biogenesis. We have recently discovered that antitumor alkaloid ellipticine (isolated in 1959 from the plant species Ochrosia) is a potent inhibitor of Pol I transcription (both in vitro and in vivo). Ellipticine and its derivatives are known as efficient topoisomerase II inhibitors and inhibitors of some kinases, however we have shown that these inhibitory activities and the ability of ellipticine to repress Pol I activity are unrelated. Moreover, our preliminary data suggests that ellipticine specifically targets Pol I transcription and it has no effect on transcription by Pol II and Pol III at the same time scale. The possible mechanisms of inhibition of Pol I transcription by ellipticines will be discussed.