1 resultado para Protocolo 802.15.4
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (9)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (29)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (4)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (16)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (33)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (5)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (3)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (106)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá, Colombia (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (39)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (10)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (13)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (92)
- Duke University (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (2)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (10)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Harvard University (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (3)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (41)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (20)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (10)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (85)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (7)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (4)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- REPOSITORIO DIGITAL IMARPE - INSTITUTO DEL MAR DEL PERÚ, Peru (3)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de El Salvador (3)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (89)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- RIBERDIS - Repositorio IBERoamericano sobre DIScapacidad - Centro Español de Documentación sobre Discapacidad (CEDD) (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (7)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (106)
- Scielo Uruguai (2)
- Sistema UNA-SUS (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (8)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (35)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade do Minho (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (7)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (20)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (41)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (6)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (15)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
PURPOSE: To better understand knowledge and attitudes concerning corneal donation among Chinese adults.
METHODS: Randomly selected residents in predetermined age strata 20 to 60+ years completed home-based questionnaires in each of 12 randomly chosen communities in Guangzhou, southern China.
RESULTS: Among 1217 selected persons, 430 (35.3%) completed the questionnaires (mean age 40.4 yrs, 57.9% female). Refusers were older (44.8 yrs, P < 0.001), but sex did not differ (52.2% female, P = 0.07). Among participants, 175 (40.7%) were willing to donate their corneas (WTD). Differences between WTD and not WTD included donation knowledge score (range, 1-12) [WTD (SD) 6.91 ± 2.21, not WTD 5.62 ± 2.43, P < 0.001]; having discussed donation (WTD 26.3%, not WTD 8.63%, P < 0.001); viewing donation as unpopular (WTD 88.0%, not WTD 96.5%, P = 0.001); and feeling donation "damages the body" (WTD 15.4%, not WTD 25.7%, P = 0.013). Associated significantly with WTD in multiple regression models were higher knowledge score [odds ratio (OR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.32, P = 0.008]; not feeling donation "damages the body" (OR = 1.91, 95% CI, 1.07-3.43, P = 0.030); and willingness to discuss donation (OR = 10.6, 95% CI, 3.35-33.9, P < 0.001). WTD did not differ by age (>60 yrs: 22/51, 43.1%; ≤60 yrs: 153/379, 40.4%, P = 0.706). Assuming all those refusing the survey would not donate, 14.4% (175/1217) were WTD for themselves, though only 7.1% (86/1217) would do so on behalf of a family member if they did not know the deceased's preference.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to increase knowledge and promote discussions about donation, and policies allowing widespread expression of donation preference, are needed in this setting.