1 resultado para Project implementation
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (11)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (4)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (26)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (33)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (13)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (13)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (11)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (8)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (7)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (9)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (45)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (2)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco - Portugal (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (224)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (18)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (9)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Open Access Repository of Association for Learning Technology (ALT) (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (84)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (5)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (10)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (3)
- Repositório de Administração Pública (REPAP) - Direção-Geral da Qualificação dos Trabalhadores em Funções Públicas (INA), Portugal (2)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (7)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (5)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (131)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (14)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (25)
- Universidade do Minho (10)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (9)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (6)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (6)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (92)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
Introduction
Evaluating quality of palliative day services is essential for assessing care across diverse settings, and for monitoring quality improvement approaches.
Aim
To develop a set of quality indicators for assessment of all aspects (structure, process and outcome) of care in palliative day services.
Methods
Using a modified version of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method (Fitch et al., 2001), a multidisciplinary panel of 16 experts independently completed a survey rating the appropriateness of 182 potential quality indicators previously identified during a systematic evidence review. Panel members then attended a one day, face-to-face meeting where indicators were discussed and subsequently re-rated. Panel members were also asked to rate the feasibility and necessity of measuring each indicator.
Results
71 indicators classified as inappropriate during the survey were removed based on median appropriateness ratings and level of agreement. Following the panel discussions, a further 60 were removed based on appropriateness and feasibility ratings, level of agreement and assessment of necessity. Themes identified during the panel discussion and findings of the evidence review were used to translate the remaining 51 indicators into a final set of 27.
Conclusion
The final indicator set included information on rationale and supporting evidence, methods of assessment, risk adjustment, and recommended performance levels. Further implementation work will test the suitability of this ‘toolkit’ for measurement and benchmarking. The final indicator set provides the basis for standardised assessment of quality across services, including care delivered in community and primary care settings.
Reference
• Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User’s Manual. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2001. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1269