1 resultado para Project Performance
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (10)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (21)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (176)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (11)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (30)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (34)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (3)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (9)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Deposito de Dissertacoes e Teses Digitais - Portugal (4)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (4)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (13)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (31)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (6)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (45)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (6)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Open University Netherlands (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (16)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (4)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (4)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (34)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (4)
- Repositório de Administração Pública (REPAP) - Direção-Geral da Qualificação dos Trabalhadores em Funções Públicas (INA), Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (6)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (5)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (21)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (2)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (23)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (16)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (24)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (15)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (5)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (10)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (3)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (39)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (218)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Introduction
Evaluating quality of palliative day services is essential for assessing care across diverse settings, and for monitoring quality improvement approaches.
Aim
To develop a set of quality indicators for assessment of all aspects (structure, process and outcome) of care in palliative day services.
Methods
Using a modified version of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method (Fitch et al., 2001), a multidisciplinary panel of 16 experts independently completed a survey rating the appropriateness of 182 potential quality indicators previously identified during a systematic evidence review. Panel members then attended a one day, face-to-face meeting where indicators were discussed and subsequently re-rated. Panel members were also asked to rate the feasibility and necessity of measuring each indicator.
Results
71 indicators classified as inappropriate during the survey were removed based on median appropriateness ratings and level of agreement. Following the panel discussions, a further 60 were removed based on appropriateness and feasibility ratings, level of agreement and assessment of necessity. Themes identified during the panel discussion and findings of the evidence review were used to translate the remaining 51 indicators into a final set of 27.
Conclusion
The final indicator set included information on rationale and supporting evidence, methods of assessment, risk adjustment, and recommended performance levels. Further implementation work will test the suitability of this ‘toolkit’ for measurement and benchmarking. The final indicator set provides the basis for standardised assessment of quality across services, including care delivered in community and primary care settings.
Reference
• Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User’s Manual. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2001. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1269