‘‘Capital of Culture - you must be having a laugh!” Challenging the official rhetoric of Liverpool as the 2008 European cultural capital’

Major cultural events are increasingly seen by local stakeholders as important opportunities to stimulate urban regeneration, city branding and economic development. The European Capital of Culture programme is a prominent example. Since 1985 over thirty cities have hosted the title and today it remains a highly sought-after prize. This paper analyses competing interpretations of the success of Liverpool's hosting of the European Capital of Culture in 2008. It unpacks contrasting views of Liverpool08, from the official triumphant message of urban regeneration and economic renaissance to more critical analyses that problematise important elements of the event and its social and spatial impacts. In so doing, it challenges the hyperbole of culture-led transformation to reveal different geographies of culture, different cultural experiences and different socio-economic realities; it also offers an additional cultural reading of Liverpool in 2008. Through the example of Liverpool this paper shows how local culture is politicised, manipulated and sanitised in order to stimulate urban regeneration and construct a spatial re-branding of the city.

De grands événements culturels sont de plus en plus perçus par les rentiers locaux comme des opportunités importantes pour stimuler la régénération urbaine, produire la devise des villes et le développement économique. L'initiative La Capitale Européenne de la Culture est un exemple proéminent. Depuis 1985, plus de trente villes ont accueilli le titre et maintenant il reste un prix largement recherché. Cet article analyse des interprétations en concurrence du succès de l'accueil de Liverpool de la Capitale Européenne de la Culture en 2008. Il déballe des vues contrastées de Liverpool08, du message officiel et triomphal de la régénération urbaine et de la renaissance économique à des analyses plus critiques qui problématisent des éléments importants de l'événement et ses impacts sociaux et spatiaux. De cette façon, il conteste l'hyperbole de la transformation menée par la culture pour révéler des géographies différentes de la culture, des expériences différentes de la culture et des réalités socioéconomiques différentes; il offre aussi une interprétation culturelle différente de Liverpool en 2008. Au travers de l'exemple de Liverpool cet article montre comment la culture locale est politisée, manipulée et aseptisée pour stimuler la régénération urbaine et construire un relookage spatial de la ville.

Cada vez más, los inversores locales vean a los eventos culturales como oportunidades importantes para estimular regeneración urbana, el desarollo económico y la branding a una ciudad. El Capital Europeo de Cultura es un ejemplo prominente. Desde 1985, más que treinta ciudades han presentado el título y hoy sigue siendo un premio deseable. Este papel se analiza interpretaciones competitivos del éxito del Capital Europea de Cultura 2008 en Liverpool. Se deshace las perspectivas opuestas del Liverpool08, del mensaje triunfante de regeneración urbana y renacimiento económico, a analices críticos que problematizan elementos importantes del evento y sus impactos sociales y espaciales. Al hacer esto, se cuestiona el hipérbole de la transformación cultural para revelar geografías diferentes de cultura, experiencias culturales diferentes y realidades diferentes socio-económicas; también ofrece un entendimiento cultural adicional de Liverpool en el 2008. Através el ejemplo de Liverpool, este papel demuestra como la cultura local está politizada, manipulada, y desinfectado para estimular regeneración urbana y construir una nueva branding de la ciudad.

The role of proximity in university-business cooperation for innovation

The potential for universities to contribute positively to business innovation has received much attention in recent years. While the determinants of university-business cooperation have been examined extensively, less attention has been given to the mediating influence of proximity in this relationship. The analysis in this paper builds on theUKbusiness innovation survey (2002–2005) by incorporating measures of the university research environment for each of the 16,500 businesses surveyed. These measures allow us to look beyond business-level characteristics as determinants of the geography of university cooperation and account for the character of the local university environment. Measures include the distance from each business to its nearest university, the quality of local university research and the density of the university research environment. The findings suggest that significant differences exist between those businesses that cooperate with local universities and those that cooperate with non-local universities. These differences relate to business size, sales profile, location, absorptive capacity and innovation activity. In addition, we also find that if a business is located close to a research excellent university, cooperation tends to remain local, however, the distance between businesses and the nearest university is not a significant determinant of university-business cooperation and further, the higher the concentration of universities in the business locale, the more likely businesses are to cooperate with non-local universities.

Il performance measurement negli enti locali. Strumenti innovativi nella prospettiva economico-aziendale

In un'epoca di risorse scarse e di crescente disaffezione verso la politica, l'azione degli enti locali ha un impatto sempre più rilevante sulla qualità della vita del cittadino. A tal fine, l'adozione di sistemi di programmazione e controllo, supportati da idonei strumenti, diviene essenziale per il perseguimento dell'efficienza e dell'efficacia e dunque per riconquistare la fiducia del cittadino stesso. Il volume, sulla base di un'analisi della normativa (dai primi anni Novanta fino al DL 174/2012 e s.m.i.) e della letteratura nazionale ed internazionale in tema di performance measurement, identifica un Modello ottimale (Modello PerformEL) per la redazione di due documenti che possono avere un ruolo centrale nel sistema di programmazione e controllo locale: il Piano e la Relazione sulla Performance. La capacità informativa di questi ultimi è testata tramite un'indagine empirica che ha coinvolto i comuni con almeno 50.000 abitanti, comparando struttura, forma e contenuti di tali documenti con quelli ritenuti ottimali e quindi inseriti nel Modello. Sulla base dei risultati dell'indagine, che mostrano una diffusa inadeguatezza informativa degli strumenti analizzati, viene proposto un percorso evolutivo per la graduale realizzazione di documenti di programmazione e controllo che, al di là della loro 'etichetta formale' (Piano della Performance piuttosto che Piano Esecutivo di Gestione, Relazione sulla Performance o Report dei Controlli interni) permetta di semplificare l'architettura informativa dell'ente locale (nel rispetto del DL 174/2012) e parimenti di trasformare i molteplici inutili adempimenti in utili documenti di performance measurement.

Gli strumenti di programmazione degli enti locali. Una fotografia della realtà emiliano-romagnola

MOTIVAZIONI DI PARTENZA Gli studi sul processo di aziendalizzazione delle pubbliche amministrazioni (Hood 1991, Mussari 1994, Valotti 2000) hanno evidenziato che esse possono essere considerate aziende per tre ragioni: istituzionale, costitutiva e comportamentale (Deidda Gagliardo 2002). In particolare, gli enti locali che intendano agire come aziende dovrebbero adottare sistemi (Bertini 1990) di programmazione e controllo (D’Alessio 1992, Borgonovi 2005), funzionali ad un miglioramento delle performances economico-sociali (Anselmi 1993, Farneti 2004). Il presente lavoro è incentrato sul sub-sistema di programmazione delle amministrazioni territoriali: si focalizza l’attenzione sugli enti locali emiliano-romagnoli in quanto caratterizzati da un buon livello di aziendalizzazione (Orelli 2005). RISULTATI ATTESI L’analisi verterà sugli strumenti di programmazione utilizzati dagli enti in oggetto e sui rapporti -orizzontali e verticali (Deidda Gagliardo 2007)- intercorrenti tra gli stessi, mirando a verificarne livello e modalità di applicazione. Lo studio partirà dai risultati della ricerca “Il contributo dei sistemi di programmazione e controllo alla governance locale in Emilia-Romagna”, coordinata dal Prof. Deidda Gagliardo e condotta, rispetto all’universo di 350 enti potenziali, sul campione delle 178 amministrazioni che hanno risposto, rappresentativo di tutte le fasce dimensionali e di tutte le zone geografiche della regione. Tale ricerca, chiusa a fine 2007, ha indagato l’arco temporale 1996 - 2006. Dall’analisi dei dati ci si attende che tutti gli enti osservati adottino gli strumenti di programmazione “obbligatori”, e che l’utilizzo di quelli “facoltativi” sia circoscritto a quelli più virtuosi. La metodologia di ricerca è di tipo misto: • fase deduttiva: sono stati studiati i principali contributi teorici; • fase induttiva: è stato somministrato un questionario strutturato a risposte chiuse ai responsabili dei servizi finanziari; • fase di feedback: si procederà all’analisi critica dei risultati al fine di verificare livello e modalità di utilizzo degli strumenti di programmazione.

Gli strumenti della performance. Un’analisi dei Piani e delle Relazioni sulla Performance 2011 nei comuni di grandi dimensioni

No abstract available

The Local and the Distributed in the Sonic Arts

This paper addresses the relationship between local and distributed strategies with reference to two recent participatory sound art projects in Belfast and Rio de Janeiro. The local concern for site and place is discussed and juxtaposed with distributed practices, which,by definition question and extend the very notion of site or locale. I refer to examples from ethnomusicology, anthropology and education in which participative horizontal research methodologies lead to a dynamic articulation of local conditions and allow for a reflection on how technology impacts on social interaction and relationships with place. The works of Samuel Araújo, Georgina Born and Brazilian pedagogue Paulo Freire provide a framework of reference in this context.

Territoriality and Migration in a Divided Society: Lay Theories of Citizenship and Place in Northern Ireland

The study of citizenship has increasingly focused on the ways in which spatialized understandings of the concept can be used to marginalise and exclude social groups: exclusive constructions of national boundaries, local neighbourhoods and public spaces can deny marginalised groups their social and political rights. Less attention has been paid to how constructions of place can accommodate different groups’ rights and promote peaceful coexistence. This is particularly important in locations where migration disrupts existing understandings (‘lay theories’) of the relationship between residency, identity and collective rights. The present research examines how spatialized understandings of citizenship shape perceptions of intergroup mixing in previously segregated areas of a post-conflict society. Critical Discursive Social Psychological (CDSP) analysis of 30 interviews with long-term residents and recent migrants to increasingly mixed areas of Belfast shows that, while all pa
rticipants acknowledged Northern Ireland’s territorialisation, different lay theories of citizenship underpin the possibility and desirability of intergroup coexistence. Long-term residents drew upon understandings of the negative citizenry of the outgroup to argue against the possibility of peaceful coexistence within their locale, while recent incomers gave evidence of their own experiences of good citizenship within the shared spaces of neighbourhood to demonstrate that this could and should be achieved. The implications of lay theories of citizenship for the study of residential migration and mixing are discussed

Shadow policing: the boundaries of community-based ‘policing’ in Northern Ireland

The intention of this article is to provide a structural and operational analysis of policing beyond the police in Northern Ireland. While the polity enjoys low levels of ‘officially’ recorded crime as part of its post-conflict status, little empirical analysis exists as to the epistemological roots of security production outside that of the Police Service of Northern Ireland. The empirical evidence presented seeks to establish that beyond more prominent analyses related to paramilitary ‘policing’, the country is in fact replete with a substantial reservoir of legitimate civil society policing – the collective mass of which contributes to policing, community safety and quality of life issues. While such non-state policing at the level of locale was recognised by the Independent Commission for Policing, structured understandings have rarely permeated governmental or academic discourse beyond anecdotal contentions. Thus, the present argument provides an empirical assessment of the complex, non-state policing landscape beyond the formal state apparatus; examines definitions and structures of such community-based policing activities; and explores issues related to co-opting this non-state security ‘otherness’ into more formal relations with the state.