Personalised and Precision Medicine in Cancer Clinical Trials: Panacea for Progress or Pandora's Box?

Cancer clinical trials have been one of the key foundations for significant advances in oncology. However, there is a clear recognition within the academic, care delivery and pharmaceutical/biotech communities that our current model of clinical trial discovery and development is no longer fit for purpose. Delivering transformative cancer care should increasingly be our mantra, rather than maintaining the status quo of, at best, the often miniscule incremental benefits that are observed with many current clinical trials. As we enter the era of precision medicine for personalised cancer care (precision and personalised medicine), it is important that we capture and utilise our greater understanding of the biology of disease to drive innovative approaches in clinical trial design and implementation that can lead to a step change in cancer care delivery. A number of advances have been practice changing (e.g. imatinib mesylate in chronic myeloid leukaemia, Herceptin in erb-B2-positive breast cancer), and increasingly we are seeing the promise of a number of newer approaches, particularly in diseases like lung cancer and melanoma. Targeting immune checkpoints has recently yielded some highly promising results. New algorithms that maximise the effectiveness of clinical trials, through for example a multi-stage, multi-arm type design are increasingly gaining traction. However, our enthusiasm for the undoubted advances that have been achieved are being tempered by a realisation that these new approaches may have significant cost implications. This article will address these competing issues, mainly from a European perspective, highlight the problems and challenges to healthcare systems and suggest potential solutions that will ensure that the cost/value rubicon is addressed in a way that allows stakeholders to work together to deliver optimal cost-effective cancer care, the benefits of which can be transferred directly to our patients.

Neuropeptides regulate expression of angiogenic growth factors in pulpal fibroblasts

In the dental pulp angiogenesis is crucial for tooth development and a prerequisite for successful repair following injury and inflammation. The role of neuropeptides in pulpal inflammation has been well documented but their role in the regulation of angiogenesis in the dental pulp has not been elucidated. Objectives: The aim was to profile the expression of angiogenic growth factors produced by pulp fibroblasts and to study the effects of neuropeptides on their expression. Methods: Human pulp fibroblasts derived from healthy molar teeth were stimulated with neuropeptides previously identified in dental pulp, namely, Substance P (SP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and calcitonin related gene peptide (CGRP) for 24 and 48 hrs. Simultaneous expression of ten growth factors was quantified using a novel human angiogenesis array (Ray Biotech, USA). Results: Pulp fibroblasts expressed human angiogenic growth factors, VEGF, bFGF, PDGF-BB, HGF, ANG2, HB-EGF, PIGF, angiogenin and leptin. Among the growth factors expressed VEGF, angiogenin and HGF were abundantly expressed compared to others. Neuropeptides induced variable effects on the expression of the angiogenic factors: CGRP potently up-regulated VEGF, bFGF, HGF and PIGF after 24 hr, while NPY tended to down regulate growth factors after 24 hr in culture but markedly up regulated ANG2, bFGF and leptin after 48 hr. SP down regulated expression of all angiogenic growth factors except for leptin, while VIP induced a small increase in expression of each growth factor, irrespective of time. Conclusion: Pulp fibroblasts express a range of angiogenic growth factors including angiogenin and leptin. Neuropeptides regulate the expression of these factors, suggesting an additional role for neuropeptides in the regulation of inflammation and healing in the dental pulp.
This work is supported by TC White Research Fund