1 resultado para ASSESSMENT IQOLA PROJECT
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (16)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (25)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (9)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (2)
- Archive of European Integration (4)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (25)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (148)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (3)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (2)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (21)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (45)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (16)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (19)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (8)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (11)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (14)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (10)
- Duke University (2)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (14)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (4)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (6)
- Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco - Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (7)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (22)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- Open Access Repository of Association for Learning Technology (ALT) (1)
- Open University Netherlands (5)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (8)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (19)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (7)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (23)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (7)
- Universidad de Alicante (11)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (25)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (18)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (26)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (57)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (218)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Introduction
Evaluating quality of palliative day services is essential for assessing care across diverse settings, and for monitoring quality improvement approaches.
Aim
To develop a set of quality indicators for assessment of all aspects (structure, process and outcome) of care in palliative day services.
Methods
Using a modified version of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method (Fitch et al., 2001), a multidisciplinary panel of 16 experts independently completed a survey rating the appropriateness of 182 potential quality indicators previously identified during a systematic evidence review. Panel members then attended a one day, face-to-face meeting where indicators were discussed and subsequently re-rated. Panel members were also asked to rate the feasibility and necessity of measuring each indicator.
Results
71 indicators classified as inappropriate during the survey were removed based on median appropriateness ratings and level of agreement. Following the panel discussions, a further 60 were removed based on appropriateness and feasibility ratings, level of agreement and assessment of necessity. Themes identified during the panel discussion and findings of the evidence review were used to translate the remaining 51 indicators into a final set of 27.
Conclusion
The final indicator set included information on rationale and supporting evidence, methods of assessment, risk adjustment, and recommended performance levels. Further implementation work will test the suitability of this ‘toolkit’ for measurement and benchmarking. The final indicator set provides the basis for standardised assessment of quality across services, including care delivered in community and primary care settings.
Reference
• Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User’s Manual. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2001. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1269