Efficient RkNN Retrieval with Arbitrary Non-Metric Similarity Measures

A RkNN query returns all objects whose nearest k neighbors
contain the query object. In this paper, we consider RkNN
query processing in the case where the distances between
attribute values are not necessarily metric. Dissimilarities
between objects could then be a monotonic aggregate of dissimilarities
between their values, such aggregation functions
being specified at query time. We outline real world cases
that motivate RkNN processing in such scenarios. We consider
the AL-Tree index and its applicability in RkNN query
processing. We develop an approach that exploits the group
level reasoning enabled by the AL-Tree in RkNN processing.
We evaluate our approach against a Naive approach
that performs sequential scans on contiguous data and an
improved block-based approach that we provide. We use
real-world datasets and synthetic data with varying characteristics
for our experiments. This extensive empirical
evaluation shows that our approach is better than existing
methods in terms of computational and disk access costs,
leading to significantly better response times.

Selection Power and Selection Labor for Information Retrieval

This study examines the relation between selection power and selection labor for information retrieval (IR). It is the first part of the development of a labor theoretic approach to IR. Existing models for evaluation of IR systems are reviewed and the distinction of operational from experimental systems partly dissolved. The often covert, but powerful, influence from technology on practice and theory is rendered explicit. Selection power is understood as the human ability to make informed choices between objects or representations of objects and is adopted as the primary value for IR. Selection power is conceived as a property of human consciousness, which can be assisted or frustrated by system design. The concept of selection power is further elucidated, and its value supported, by an example of the discrimination enabled by index descriptions, the discovery of analogous concepts in partly independent scholarly and wider public discourses, and its embodiment in the design and use of systems. Selection power is regarded as produced by selection labor, with the nature of that labor changing with different historical conditions and concurrent information technologies. Selection labor can itself be decomposed into description and search labor. Selection labor and its decomposition into description and search labor will be treated in a subsequent article, in a further development of a labor theoretic approach to information retrieval.

Description and search labor for information retrieval

Selection power is taken as the fundamental value for information retrieval systems. Selection power is regarded as produced by selection labor, which itself separates historically into description and search labor. As forms of mental labor, description and search labor participate in the conditions for labor and for mental labor. Concepts and distinctions applicable to physical and mental labor are indicated, introducing the necessity of labor for survival, the idea of technology as a human construction, and the possibility of the transfer of human labor to technology. Distinctions specific to mental labor, particular between semantic and syntactic labor, are introduced. Description labor is exemplified by cataloging, classification, and database description, can be more formally understood as the labor involved in the transformation of objects for description into searchable descriptions, and is also understood to include interpretation. The costs of description labor are discussed. Search labor is conceived as the labor expended in searching systems. For both description and search labor, there has been a progressive reduction in direct human labor, with its syntactic aspects transferred to technology, effectively compelled by the high relative costs of direct human labor compared to machine processes.