Fyn kinase initiates complementary signals required for IgE-dependent mast cell degranulation

FcRI activation of mast cells is thought to involve Lyn and Syk kinases proximal to the receptor and the signaling complex organized by the linker for activation of T cells (LAT). We report here that FcRI also uses a Fyn kinase-dependent pathway that does not require Lyn kinase or the adapter LAT for its initiation, but is necessary for mast cell degranulation. Lyn-deficiency enhanced Fyn-dependent signals and degranulation, but inhibited the calcium response. Fyn-deficiency impaired degranulation, whereas Lyn-mediated signaling and calcium was normal. Thus, FcRI-dependent mast cell degranulation involves cross-talk between Fyn and Lyn kinases.

Mast cell mediator release in nonasthmatic subjects after endobronchial adenosine challenge

Background: Adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP) has been shown to cause bronchoconstriction in atopic subjects but to have no effect on nonatopic nonasthmatic subjects. Endobronchial AMP challenge has previously been shown to cause mast cell mediator release in asthmatic subjects, but it is unknown whether a similar response occurs in atopic nonasthmatic and nonatopic nonasthmatic control subjects who have no response to inhalation AMP challenge.

Objective: This study examined the change in mast cell–derived products after endobronchial saline challenge and AMP challenge in subjects with and without a positive inhalation response to AMP.

Methods: Inhalation challenge with AMP challenge was performed in normal, atopic nonasthmatic, and atopic asthmatic subjects. Levels of mast cell mediators were measured after endobronchial adenosine challenge and after placebo endobronchial saline challenge.

Results: There were significant increases in histamine, tryptase, protein, and prostaglandin D2 levels (P = .02, P = .02, P = .01, and P = .01, respectively) after AMP challenge compared with after saline challenge in nonatopic nonasthmatic subjects. There was no significant increase in any mediator in either of the other 2 groups.

Conclusion: This study suggests dissociation between mediator release and bronchoconstriction in response to AMP.

Structure activity studies of mast cell activation and hypotension induced by neuropeptide Y (NPY), centrally truncated and C-terminal NPY analogues

1 Neuropeptide-induced histamine release is thought to occur via receptor-independent mechanisms, with net charge and lipophilicity being important factors.

Influence of alpha-helicity, amphipathicity and D-amino acid incorporation on the peptide-induced mast cell activation

Mast cell activation by polycationic substances is believed to result from a direct activation of G protein alpha subunits and it was suggested that the adaption of amphipathic, alpha-helical conformations would allow the peptide to reach the cytosolic compartment to interact with G proteins (Mousli et al., 1994, Immunopharmacology 27, 1, for review). We investigated the histamine-releasing activity of model peptides as well as analogues of magainin 2 amide and neuropeptide Y with different amphipathicities and alpha-helix content on rat peritoneal mast cells. Amphipathic helicity is not a prerequisite for mast cell activation. Moreover, non-helical magainin peptides with high histamine-releasing activity were less active in the liberation of carboxyfluoresceine from negatively charged liposomes, indicating that peptide-induced mast cell activation and peptide-induced membrane perturbation do not correlate. In contrast to the negligible influence of the secondary structure, amino acid configuration may exert a striking influence on peptide-induced mast cell activation. Thus histamine-release by substance P was markedly impaired when the L-amino acids in the positively charged N-terminal region were replaced by D-amino acids, with [D-Arg(1)]substance P being the most inactive substance P diastereoisomer.

EFFECT OF IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO LOVASTATIN TREATMENT ON MAST-CELL ACTIVATION

The hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzmye A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitor lovastatin is used to treat hyperlipidaemia. This agent prevents the isoprenylation of some proteins involved in signal transduction processes and inhibits IgE-receptor-linked mediator release from RBL-2H3 cells. In this study the effect of in vivo and in vitro administration of lovastatin on histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells was examined. Lovastatin (4 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks) inhibited histamine release induced by concanavalin A (con A) from rat peritoneal mast cells of Hooded-Lister rats and both homozygous lean and obese Zucker rats. In contrast, release induced by antirat IgE (anti-IgE) was only significantly inhibited in cells derived from Hooded-Lister rats and that induced by compound 48/ 80 was not altered. Lovastatin (20 mu M, 24 h, in vitro) caused a significant inhibition of the subsequent histamine release to con A, anti-IgE and compound 48/80 but not to the calcium ionophore A 23187. It is important to determine whether such inhibitory effects are also observed after the chronic, clinical administration of lovastatin and other HMG CoA reductase inhibitors.

Clinical consequences of mast cell heterogeneity

The heterogeneous morphological, biochemical and functional characteristics of mast cells from different species and from different tissue sites in the same species have been described for over 30 years. Far from being mere histochemical or pharmacological curiosities these differences have far reaching implications for therapeutic practice. This review concentrates on two important areas affected by mast cell heterogeneity, those of adverse reactions to therapeutic agents and the efficacy of anti-allergy therapy.

A New Stereocontrolled Total Synthesis of the Mast Cell inhibitory Alkaloid, (+)-Monanchorin, via the Wittig Reaction of a Stabilized Ylide with a Cyclic Guanidine Hemiaminal

Abstract Image

An asymmetric total synthesis of the mast cell inhibitor (+)-monanchorin is reported in which a Sharpless AD on 11 and a cyclic sulfate ring opening with an azide feature as key steps. After further manipulation, a novel guanidine-controlled ester reduction provided the guanidine-hemiaminal 25 which underwent Wittig olefination to give 27. Hydrogenation and a second guanidine-controlled reduction of the ester in 28, to obtain aldehyde 29, then set up a trifluoroacetic acid mediated cyclization to give (+)-monanchorin TFA salt.

Topical antihistamines and mast cell stabilisers for treating seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis

BACKGROUND: Seasonal/perennial allergic conjunctivitis is the most common allergic conjunctivitis, usually with acute manifestations when a person is exposed to allergens and with typical signs and symptoms including itching, redness, and tearing. The clinical signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis are mediated by the release of histamine by mast cells. Histamine antagonists (also called antihistamines) inhibit the action of histamine by blocking histamine H1 receptors, antagonising the vasoconstrictor, and to a lesser extent, the vasodilator effects of histamine. Mast cell stabilisers inhibit degranulation and consequently the release of histamine by interrupting the normal chain of intracellular signals. Topical treatments include eye drops with antihistamines, mast cell stabilisers, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, combinations of the previous treatments, and corticosteroids. Standard treatment is based on topical antihistamines alone or topical mast cell stabilisers alone or a combination of treatments. There is clinical uncertainty about the relative efficacy and safety of topical treatment.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of topical antihistamines and mast cell stabilisers, alone or in combination, for use in treating seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis.

SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2014, Issue 7), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to July 2014), EMBASE (January 1980 to July 2014), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 17 July 2014. We also searched the reference lists of review articles and relevant trial reports for details of further relevant publications.

SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical antihistamine and mast cell stabilisers, alone or in combination, with placebo, no treatment or to any other antihistamine or mast cell stabiliser, or both, that examined people with seasonal or perennial allergic conjunctivitis, or both. The primary outcome was any participant-reported evaluation (by questionnaire) of severity of four main ocular symptoms: itching, irritation, watering eye (tearing), and photophobia (dislike of light), both separately and, if possible, by an overall symptom score. We considered any follow-up time between one week and one year.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Disagreements were resolved by discussion among review authors and the involvement of a third review author. We followed standard methodological approaches used by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS: We identified 30 trials with a total of 4344 participants randomised, with 17 different drugs or treatment comparisons. The following antihistamines and mast cell stabilisers were evaluated in at least one RCT: nedocromil sodium or sodium cromoglycate, olopatadine, ketotifen, azelastine, emedastine, levocabastine (or levocabastine), mequitazine, bepotastine besilate, combination of antazoline and tetryzoline, combination of levocabastine and pemirolast potassium. The most common comparison was azelastine versus placebo (nine studies).We observed a large variability in reporting outcomes. The quality of the studies and reporting was variable, but overall the risk of bias was low. Trials evaluated only short-term effects, with a range of treatment of one to eight weeks. Meta-analysis was only possible in one comparison (olopatadine versus ketotifen). There was some evidence to support that topical antihistamines and mast cell stabilisers reduce symptoms and signs of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis when compared with placebo. There were no reported serious adverse events related to the use of topical antihistamine and mast cell stabilisers treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It seems that all reported topical antihistamines and mast cell stabilisers reduce symptoms and signs of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis when compared with placebo in the short term. However, there is no long-term data on their efficacy. Direct comparisons of different antihistamines and mast cell stabilisers need to be interpreted with caution. Overall, topical antihistamines and mast cell stabilisers appear to be safe and well tolerated. We observed a large variability in outcomes reported. Poor quality of reporting challenged the synthesis of evidence.

A comparison of three standard methods of identifying mast cells in endobronchial biopsies in normal and asthmatic subjects

Reported mast-cell counts in endobronchial biopsies from asthmatic subjects are conflicting, with different methodologies often being used. This study compared three standard methods of counting mast cells in endobronchial biopsies from asthmatic and normal subjects. Endobronchial biopsies were obtained from atopic asthmatic subjects (n=17), atopic nonasthmatic subjects (n=6), and nonatopic nonasthmatic control subjects (n=5). After overnight fixation in Carnoy's fixative, mast cells were stained by the short and long toluidine blue methods and antitryptase immunohistochemistry and were counted by light microscopy. Method comparison was made according to Bland & Altman. The limits of agreement were unacceptable for each of the comparisons, suggesting that the methods are not interchangeable. Coefficients of repeatability were excellent, and not different for the individual techniques. These results suggest that some of the reported differences in mast-cell numbers in endobronchial biopsies in asthma may be due to the staining method used, making direct comparisons between studies invalid. Agreement on a standard method is required for counting mast cells in bronchial biopsies, and we recommend the immunohistochemical method, since fixation is less critical and the resultant tissue sections facilitate clear, accurate, and rapid counts.

Liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica)-derived peptides activate rat peritoneal mast cells

Short peptides with sequences derived from those found in the tegumental antigen of Fasciola hepatica have been synthesised. Incubation of some of these peptides with rat peritoneal mast cells resulted in the degranulation of the cells as measured by a histamine release assay. This activity was shown to be associated with the proline-lysine-proline motif, which is responsible for the induction of mast cell degranulation by the mammalian bioactive peptide substance P. Studies on the mode of action of the fluke-derived peptide indicated that it was operating through the same biochemical pathways as substance P. The implications of these findings for the development of immune responses during parasite infections are discussed. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.