The differential effects of chlorpromazine and haloperidol on latent inhibition in healthy volunteers.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a measure of reduced learning about a stimulus to which there has been prior exposure without any consequence. It therefore requires a comparison between a pre-exposed (PE) and a non-pre-exposed (NPE) condition. Since, in animals, LI is disrupted by amphetamines and enhanced by antipsychotics, LI disruption has been proposed as a measure of the characteristic attentional deficit in schizophrenia: the inability to ignore irrelevant stimuli. The findings in humans are, however, inconsistent. In particular, a recent investigation suggested that since haloperidol disrupted LI in healthy volunteers, and LI was normal in non-medicated patients with schizophrenia, the previous findings in schizophrenic patients were entirely due to the negative effects of their medication on LI (Williams et al., 1998). We conducted two studies of antipsychotic drug effects on auditory LI using a within-subject, parallel group design in healthy volunteers. In the first of these, single doses of haloperidol (1 mg. i.v.) were compared with paroxetine (20 mg p.o.) and placebo, and in the second, chlorpromazine (100 mg p.o.) was compared with lorazepam (2 mg. p.o.) and placebo. Eye movements, neuropsychological test performance (spatial working memory (SWM), Tower of London and intra/extra dimensional shift, from the CANTAB test battery) and visual analogue rating scales, were also included as other measures of attention and frontal lobe function. Haloperidol was associated with a non-significant reduction in LI scores, and dysphoria/akathisia (Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale) in three-quarters of the subjects. The LI finding may be explained by increased distractibility which was indicated by an increase in antisaccade directional errors in this group. In contrast, LI was significantly increased by chlorpromazine but not by an equally sedative dose of lorazepam (both drugs causing marked decreases in peak saccadic velocity). Paroxetine had no effect on LI, eye movements or CANTAB neuropsychological test performance. Haloperidol was associated with impaired SWM, which correlated with the degree of dysphoria/akathisia, but no other drug effects on CANTAB measures were detected. We conclude that the effect of antipsychotics on LI is both modality and pharmacologically dependent and that further research using a wider range of antipsychotic compounds is necessary to clarify the cognitive effects of these drugs, and to determine whether there are important differences between them.

Effect of intravenous haloperidol on the duration of delirium and coma in critically ill patients (Hope-ICU):A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Background: Delirium is frequently diagnosed in critically ill patients and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Haloperidol is the most commonly used drug for delirium despite little evidence of its effectiveness. The aim of this study was to establish whether early treatment with haloperidol would decrease the time that survivors of critical illness spent in delirium or coma. Methods: We did this double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial in a general adult intensive care unit (ICU). Critically ill patients (≥18 years) needing mechanical ventilation within 72 h of admission were enrolled. Patients were randomised (by an independent nurse, in 1:1 ratio, with permuted block size of four and six, using a centralised, secure web-based randomisation service) to receive haloperidol 2·5 mg or 0·9% saline placebo intravenously every 8 h, irrespective of coma or delirium status. Study drug was discontinued on ICU discharge, once delirium-free and coma-free for 2 consecutive days, or after a maximum of 14 days of treatment, whichever came first. Delirium was assessed using the confusion assessment method for the ICU (CAM-ICU). The primary outcome was delirium-free and coma-free days, defined as the number of days in the first 14 days after randomisation during which the patient was alive without delirium and not in coma from any cause. Patients who died within the 14 day study period were recorded as having 0 days free of delirium and coma. ICU clinical and research staff and patients were masked to treatment throughout the study. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Registry, number ISRCTN83567338. Findings: 142 patients were randomised, 141 were included in the final analysis (71 haloperidol, 70 placebo). Patients in the haloperidol group spent about the same number of days alive, without delirium, and without coma as did patients in the placebo group (median 5 days [IQR 0-10] vs 6 days [0-11] days; p=0·53). The most common adverse events were oversedation (11 patients in the haloperidol group vs six in the placebo group) and QTc prolongation (seven patients in the haloperidol group vs six in the placebo group). No patient had a serious adverse event related to the study drug. Interpretation: These results do not support the hypothesis that haloperidol modifies duration of delirium in critically ill patients. Although haloperidol can be used safely in this population of patients, pending the results of trials in progress, the use of intravenous haloperidol should be reserved for short-term management of acute agitation. Funding: National Institute for Health Research. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

Differential effects of the CCKA receptor ligands PD-140, 548 and A-71623 on latent inhibition in the rat.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioural paradigm in which repeated exposure to a stimulus without consequence inhibits the formation of any new associations with that stimulus. To the extent that LI reflects a process of learning to ignore irrelevant stimuli, disrupted LI has been suggested as an animal model for the attentional deficits observed in schizophrenia. The antipsychotic potential of cholecystokinin (CCK) stems from its colocalization with dopamine (DA) in the mesolimbic pathway, where it demonstrates both excitatory and inhibitory effects on dopaminergic activity. This may be explained by mediation through different receptor subtypes. A variety of hypotheses has emerged regarding the potential clinical application of subtype-selective CCK-based drugs. The present experiments examined the effects on LI of two selective CCKA ligands: PD-140,548 (a CCKA antagonist, Experiment 1: 0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 mg/kg) and A-71623 (a CCKA agonist, Experiment 2: 0.02, 0.05, and 0.1 mg/kg). In both experiments, the effects of haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) were also investigated. Animals receiving 0.1 mg/kg of haloperidol or 0.001 or 0.1 mg/kg (but not 0.01 mg/kg) of PD-140,548 treated the preexposed stimulus as irrelevant after a low number of preexposures. In contrast, no facilitatory effect on LI was detectable at any of the A-71623 doses. The finding that A-71623 failed to enhance LI indicates that it is unlikely that this compound would have any antipsychotic effect within the clinical setting. Considering the facilitatory effect exerted by PD-140,548 on LI, it is probable that the inhibition of CCK activity might prove a more promising strategy for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia.

A national survey of the mangement of delirium in UK intensive care units

Background: Delirium is an acute organ dysfunction common amongst patients treated in intensive care units. The associated morbidity and mortality are known to be substantial. Previous surveys have described which screening tools are used to diagnose delirium and which medications are used to treat delirium, but these data are not available for the United Kingdom. Aim: This survey aimed to describe the UK management of delirium by consultant intensivists. Additionally, knowledge and attitudes towards management of delirium were sought. The results will inform future research in this area. Methods: A national postal survey of members of the UK Intensive Care Society was performed. A concise two page questionnaire survey was sent, with a second round of surveys sent to non-respondents after 6 weeks. The questionnaire was in tick-box format. Results: Six hundred and eighty-one replies were received from 1308 questionnaires sent, giving a response rate of 52%. Twenty-five percent of respondents routinely screen for delirium, but of these only 55% use a screening tool validated for use in intensive care. The majority (80%) of those using a validated instrument used the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Hyperactive delirium is treated pharmacologically by 95%; hypoactive delirium is treated pharmacologically by 25%, with haloperidol the most common agent used in both. Over 80% of respondents agreed that delirium prolongs mechanical ventilation and hospital stay and requires active treatment. Conclusions: This UK survey demonstrates screening for delirium is sporadic. Pharmacological treatment is usually with haloperidol in spite of the limited evidence to support this practice. Hypoactive delirium is infrequently treated pharmacologically.

α-adrenoceptors do not mediate reflex mydriasis in rabbits

The aim of this study was to identify receptors that mediate reflex mydriasis in pentobarbital-anesthetized rabbits, in which the cervical sympathetic nerve was sectioned unilaterally. Voltage-response curves of pupillary dilation were generated bilaterally by stimulation of the sciatic nerve. Evoked mydriatic responses were mediated mainly by efferent parasympathetic innervation, and, to a lesser extent, by sympathetic innervation. The a-adrenergic antagonist, phenoxybenzamine (0.3 mg/kg, intravenously (i.v.)), antagonized mydriasis of the neurally intact eye, but not that on the sympathectomized side. The a- adrenergic antagonist, RS 79948 (0.3 mg/kg, i.v.), potentiated mydriasis of the normal eye, but was without either a potentiating or inhibitory effect on the mydriasis of the sympathectomized eye. In addition, the dopamine-receptor antagonist, haloperidol (1 mg/kg, i.v.), inhibited evoked mydriasis of the sympathectomized eye. These results suggest that, unlike some other species (cats and rats), a-adrenoceptors do not mediate reflex mydriasis elicited by sciatic-nerve stimulation in the rabbit, and support the previous finding in humans that dopamine receptors may mediate this response.