An in vitro model of nociceptors in human trigeminal nerves

Background: The oro-facial region is densely innervated by the trigeminal nerve, which when stimulated can induce noxious pain sensation and contribute to neurogenic inflammation in local tissues. Recent research on the expression of specialised ion channels on the trigeminal nerve has highlighted the need to undertake more extensive studies on ion channel expression/functionality with the aim of elucidating their role in pain sensations. A major family of such ion channels is the transient receptor potential (TRP) channels which are activated by a wide variety of thermal, mechanical or chemical stimuli and merit investigation as possible druggable targets for future analgesics.
Objective: Study of TRP channel expression and regulation in oro-facial tissues is hindered by the fact that the cell bodies of neurons innervating these tissues are located in the trigeminal ganglion. Using dental pulp stem cells differentiated towards peripheral neuronal equivalents (PNEs), we sought to determine TRP channel expression, functionality and potential modulation by cytokines in this novel model.
Method: Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) were grown on substrate-coated tissue culture plates and differentiated towards a neuronal phenotype using neuronal induction media. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed on PNEs +/-cytokine treatment. Ion channel functionality was investigated using whole cell patch clamping.
Result: qPCR analysis showed that PNEs expressed the TRP channels TRPA1, TRPV1, TRPV4 and TRPM8. TRPA1 was the most abundantly expressed TRP channel studied whereas TRPM8 was lowly expressed. TRP channel expression was shown to be regulated by treatment with inflammatory cytokines. Patch clamp studies using specific agonists and antagonists for TRPA1 and TRPV1 showed these channels were functional.
Conclusion: PNEs differentiated from DPSCs provide a suitable model for TRP channel expression, regulation, and sensistisation in oro-facial tissues. This human neuronal model has potential for use in pre-clinical studies of novel analgesics.

Pain and suffering in invertebrates?

All animals face hazards that cause tissue damage and most have nociceptive reflex responses that protect them from such damage. However, some taxa have also evolved the capacity for pain experience, presumably to enhance longterm protection through behavior modification based on memory of the unpleasant nature of pain. In this article I review various criteria that might distinguish nociception from pain. Because nociceptors are so taxonomically widespread, simply demonstrating their presence is not sufficient. Furthermore, investigation of the central nervous system provides limited clues about the potential to experience pain. Opioids and other analgesics might indicate a central modulation of responses but often peripheral effects could explain the analgesia; thus reduction of responses by analgesics and opioids does not allow clear discrimination between nociception and pain. Physiological changes in response to noxious stimuli or the threat of a noxious stimulus might prove useful but, to date, application to invertebrates is limited. Behavior of the organism provides the greatest insights. Rapid avoidance learning and prolonged memory indicate central processing rather than simple reflex and are consistent with the experience of pain. Complex, prolonged grooming or rubbing may demonstrate an awareness of the specific site of stimulus application. Tradeoffs with other motivational systems indicate central processing, and an ability to use complex information suggests sufficient cognitive ability for the animal to have a fitness benefit from a pain experience. Available data are consistent with the idea of pain in some invertebrates and go beyond the idea of just nociception but are not definitive. In the absence of conclusive data, more humane care for invertebrates is suggested.