The influence of comorbidity on the risk of access-related bacteremia in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Access-related bacteremia is an important cause of morbidity in chronic hemodialysis patients. The incidence of bacteremia is higher in patients dialyzing through a tunneled central venous catheter (TCVC) compared with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). Our aim was to explore if this is explained by patient comorbidity. Two groups of chronic hemodialysis outpatients were compared: all patients who dialyzed through a TCVC at any time during 2003 and were fit enough to subsequently have a functioning AVF or renal transplant even if it was after 2003 (Group 1; n=93); and all patients who dialyzed through a TCVC in 2003 and were not fit enough to have a functioning AVF or renal transplant (Group 2; n=119). Episodes of bacteremia (n=71) were identified and those not related to access were excluded. Patients in Group 1 were younger than Group 2 (57.5 years vs. 64.8 years; P=0.001). The incidences of bacteremia in Groups 1 and 2 were, respectively, 0.31 and 0.44 episodes per 1000 patient days while dialyzing through an AVF (P=0.77), and 2.21 and 2.27 per 1000 days while dialyzing through a TCVC (P=0.91). The 3-year actual survival from January 1, 2003 to January 1, 2006 was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (80.6% vs. 26.1%; P<0.0001) confirming the higher comorbidity of the patients in Group 2. Patients dialyzing through a TCVC (compared with an AVF) have a significantly higher risk of access-related bacteremia, irrespective of comorbidity.

Glycated Hemoglobin and Risk of Death in Diabetic Patients Treated With Hemodialysis: A Meta-analysis

Background: Studies investigating the association between glycated hemoglobin (HbA) level and mortality risk in diabetic patients receiving hemodialysis have shown conflicting results. 
Study Design: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. 
Setting & Population: Diabetic patients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy. 
Selection Criteria for Studies: Observational studies or randomized controlled trials investigating the association between HbA values and mortality risk. Study authors were asked to provide anonymized individual patient data or reanalyze results according to a standard template. 
Predictor: Single measurement or mean HbA values. Mean HbA values were calculated using all individual-patient HbA values during the follow-up period of contributing studies. 
Outcome: HR for mortality risk. 
Results: 10 studies (83,684 participants) were included: 9 observational studies and one secondary analysis of a randomized trial. After adjustment for confounders, patients with baseline HbA levels =8.5% (=69 mmol/mol) had increased mortality (7 studies; HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09-1.19) compared with patients with HbA levels of 6.5%-7.4% (48-57 mmol/mol). Likewise, patients with a mean HbA value =8.5% also had a higher adjusted risk of mortality (6 studies; HR,1.29; 95% CI, 1.23-1.35). There was a small but nonsignificant increase in mortality associated with mean HbA levels =5.4% (=36 mmol/mol; 6 studies; HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.89-1.34). Sensitivity analyses in incident (=90 days of hemodialysis) and prevalent patients (>90 days of hemodialysis) showed a similar pattern. In incident patients, mean HbA levels =5.4% also were associated with increased mortality risk (4 studies; HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23-1.35). 
Limitations: Observational study data and inability to adjust for diabetes type in all studies. 
Conclusions: Despite concerns about the utility of HbA measurement in hemodialysis patients, high levels (=8.5%) are associated with increased mortality risk. Very low HbA levels (=5.4%) also may be associated with increased mortality risk. 

Preserving arteriovenous fistula outcomes during surgical training

PURPOSE: Arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) are the preferred option for vascular access, as they are associated with lower mortality in hemodialysis patients than in those patients with arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) or central venous catheters (CVCs). We sought to assess whether vascular access outcomes for surgical trainees are comparable to fully trained surgeons.

METHODS: A prospectively collected database of patients was created and information recorded regarding patient demographics, past medical history, preoperative investigations, grade of operating surgeon, type of AVF formed, primary AVF function, cumulative AVF survival and functional patency.

RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-two patients were identified as having had vascular access procedures during the 6 month study period and 143 were included in the final analysis. Secondary AVF patency was established in 123 (86%) of these AVFs and 89 (62.2%) were used for dialysis. There was no significant difference in survival of AVFs according to training status of surgeon (log rank x2 0.506 p=0.477) or type of AVF (log rank x2 0.341 p=0.559). Patency rates of successful AVFs at 1 and 2 years were 60.9% and 47.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated in this prospective study that there are no significant differences in outcomes of primary AVFs formed by fully trained surgeons versus surgical trainees. Creation of a primary AVF represents an excellent training platform for intermediate stage surgeons across general and vascular surgical specialties.

Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis

Statins reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients at high cardiovascular risk. However, a benefit of statins in such patients who are undergoing hemodialysis has not been proved.