Influence of Formulation Factors on PpIX Production and Photodynamic Action of Novel ALA-loaded Microparticles

A novel 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-containing microparticulate system was produced recently, based on incorporation of ALA into particles prepared from a suppository base that maintains drug stability during storage and melts at skin temperature to release its drug payload. The novel particulate system was applied to the skin of living animals, followed by study of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) production. The effect of formulating the microparticles in different vehicles was investigated and also the phototoxicity of the PpIX produced using a model tumour. Particles formulated in propylene glycol gels (10% w/w ALA loading) generated the highest peak PpIX fluorescence levels in normal mouse skin. Peak PpIX levels induced in skin overlying subcutaneously implanted WiDr tumours were significantly lower than in normal skin for both the 10% w/w ALA microparticles alone and the 10% w/w ALA microparticles in propylene glycol gels during continuous 12 h applications. Tumours not treated with photodynamic therapy continued to grow over the 17 days of the anti-tumour study. However, those treated with 12 h applications of either the 10% w/w ALA microparticles alone or the 10% w/w ALA microparticles in propylene glycol gel followed by a single laser irradiation showed no growth. The gel formulation performed slightly better once again, reducing the tumour growth rate by approximately 105%, compared with the 89% reduction achieved using particles alone. Following the promising results obtained in this study, work is now going on to prepare particle-loaded gels under GMP conditions with the aim of initiating an exploratory clinical trial.

Analysis of compressive membrane action in concrete slabs

This paper summarises the results obtained from non-linear finite-element analysis (NLFEA) of a series of reinforced-concrete one-way slabs with various boundary conditions representative of a bridge deck slab strip in which compressive membrane action governs the structural behaviour. The application of NLFEA for the optimum analysis and design of in-plane restrained concrete slabs is explored. An accurate material model and various equation solution methods were assessed to find a suitable finite-element method for the analysis of concrete slabs in which arching action occurs. Finally, the results from the NLFEA are compared and validated with those from various experimental test data. Significantly, the numerical analysis was able to model the arching action that occurred as a result of external in-plane restraint at the supports and which enhanced the ultimate strength of the slab. The NLFEA gave excellent predictions for the ultimate load-carrying capacity and far more accurate predictions than those obtained using standard flexural or elastic theory.

Research on Ultimate Loading Carrying Capacities in Concrete Bridge Deck Slabs with Consideration of Compressive Membrane Action

In the investigation of real loading capacities in concrete bridge deck slabs,the study of this type of structure was carried out with consideration of compressive membrane action.A series of experimental test of steel-concrete bridge structures was developed with the analysis of influences from the varying of structural parameters on loading capacities,including reinforcement percentages,supporting beam sizes and concrete compressive strength.Through the study of the experimental results,it was found that the real structural loading capacities are larger than those predicted by current design methods.Therefore,based on the previous research,a prediction method for loading capacities of concrete bridge deck slabs was established with consideration of CMA,which was built based on the plastic ultimate analysis.In this method,the lateral restraint stiffness subjected by concrete bridge deck slabs was provided.The proposed theoretical model is capable of predicting the loading capacities of this type of structure accurately with comparison of results from several bridge deck experimental tests.

Self-perception of dentofacial attractiveness among patients requiring orthognathic surgery

Objective: To test the hypothesis that the self-perception of dental and facial attractiveness among patients requiring orthognathic surgery is no different from that of control patients.

Materials and Methods: Happiness with dental and facial appearance was assessed using questionnaires completed by 162 patients who required orthognathic treatment and 157 control subjects. Visual analog scale, binary, and open response data were collected. Analysis was carried out using a general linear model, logistic regression, and chi-square tests.

Results: Orthognathic patients were less happy with their dental appearance than were controls. Class II patients and women had lower happiness scores for their dental appearance. Among orthognathic patients, the "shape" and "prominence" of their teeth were the most frequent causes of concern. Older subjects, women, and orthognathic patients were less happy with their facial appearance. Class III orthognathic patients, older subjects, and women were more likely to have looked at their own face in profile. A greater proportion of Class II subjects than Class III subjects wished to change their appearance.

Conclusions: The hypothesis is rejected. The findings indicate that women and patients requiring orthognathic surgery had lower levels of happiness with their dentofacial appearance. Although Class II patients exhibited the lowest levels of happiness with their dental appearance, there was some evidence that concerns and awareness about their facial profile were more pronounced among the Class III patients.

Comparisons, mental models, and the action effect in judgments of regret

People tend to attribute more regret to a character who has decided to take action and experienced a negative outcome than to one who has decided not to act and experienced a negative outcome. For some decisions, however, this finding is not observed in a between-participants design and thus appears to rely on comparisons between people's representations of action and their representations of inaction. In this article, we outline a mental models account that explains findings from studies that have used within- and between-participants designs, and we suggest that, for decisions with uncertain counterfactual outcomes, information about the consequences of a decision to act causes people to flesh out their representation of the counterfactual states of affairs for inaction. In three experiments, we confirm our predictions about participants' fleshing out of representations, demonstrating that an action effect occurs only when information about the consequences of action is available to participants as they rate the nonactor and when this information about action is informative with respect to judgments about inaction. It is important to note that the action effect always occurs when the decision scenario specifies certain counterfactual outcomes. These results suggest that people sometimes base their attributions of regret on comparisons among different sets of mental models.