Electron-impact ionization of Xe 24 +

Configuration-average distorted-wave calculations are carried out for the electron-impact single ionization of Xe 24 + . Contributions are included from direct ionization of the 3s, 3p, 3d and 4s subshells and from indirect ionization via 3s → nl , 3p → nl and 3d → nl excitations followed by autoionization. Branching ratios are found for single versus double ionization of the 3s and 3p subshells and for autoionization versus radiative decay of all 3 l → nl excitations. Additional distorted-wave and R -matrix calculations find resonant-capture double-autoionization contributions to be quite small. The total ionization cross section for Xe 24 + is found to be dominated by indirect excitation–autoionization contributions, especially near the single-ionization threshold. An approximate 15% reduction in the total ionization cross section is found due to the radiative decays included in the branching ratios.

The effects of radiative cascades on the x-ray diagnostic lines of Fe16+

We present complete collisional-radiative modelling results for the soft x-ray emission lines of Fe16+ in the 15 Å–17 Å range. These lines have been the subject of much controversy in the astrophysical and laboratory plasma community. Radiative transition rates are generated from fully relativistic atomic structure calculations. Electron-impact excitation cross sections are determined using a fully relativistic R-matrix method employing 139 coupled atomic levels through n = 5. We find that, in all cases, using a simple ratio of the collisional rate coefficient times a radiative branching factor is not sufficient to model the widely used diagnostic line ratios. One has to include the effects of collisional-radiative cascades in a population model to achieve accurate line ratios. Our line ratio results agree well with several previous calculations and reasonably well with tokamak experimental measurements, assuming a Maxwellian electron-energy distribution. Our modelling results for four EBIT line ratios, assuming a narrow Gaussian electron-energy distribution, are in generally poor agreement with all four NIST measurements but are in better agreement with the two LLNL measurements. These results suggest the need for an investigation of the theoretical polarization calculations that are required to interpret the EBIT line ratio measurements.