‘Playing it by the rules': the politics of research in ‘race' and education

This article offers an examination of the interplay between politics, ethics, theory and methodology as they impact upon social research, through a critical analysis of the ethnographic study conducted by Peter Foster. It will be argued that his highly contentious claim to have found no manifestations of racism (either direct or indirect) throughout his study of an inner-city, multi-ethnic comprehensive school was, in the last analysis, both misleading and inaccurate. It will be contended that such claims were based upon a research design and methodology which were ultimately determined by his own political orientation and the ethical and theoretical positions which he developed as a consequence.

The effects and side-effects of statistics education: Psychology students’ (mis-)conceptions of probability

In three studies we looked at two typical misconceptions of probability: the representativeness heuristic, and the equiprobability bias. The literature on statistics education predicts that some typical errors and biases (e.g., the equiprobability bias) increase with education, whereas others decrease. This is in contrast with reasoning theorists’ prediction who propose that education reduces misconceptions in general. They also predict that students with higher cognitive ability and higher need for cognition are less susceptible to biases. In Experiments 1 and 2 we found that the equiprobability bias increased with statistics education, and it was negatively correlated with students’ cognitive abilities. The representativeness heuristic was mostly unaffected by education, and it was also unrelated to cognitive abilities. In Experiment 3 we demonstrated through an instruction manipulation (by asking participants to think logically vs. rely on their intuitions) that the reason for these differences was that these biases originated in different cognitive processes.

The experience of research participation for family caregivers of palliative care cancer patients

There have been concerns raised regarding the ethical merit of involving dying patients and family caregivers as research participants. This study sought feedback from 103 primary family caregivers who had participated in a longitudinal research project. Caregivers were sent a questionnaire regarding the benefits and negative aspects associated with participating in research while also supporting or having supported a relative dying of cancer. The study identified that almost three quarters (71.1%) of the 45 respondents reported benefits of being involved in research and the majority (88.9%) cited no negative aspects associated with research participation. Findings of the study suggest that it is pertinent to invite family caregivers to be involved in palliative care research. Moreover, this study demonstrated that not only is it probably safe for family caregivers to be involved in research but also that many participants actually derive benefits.