The differential effects of chlorpromazine and haloperidol on latent inhibition in healthy volunteers.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a measure of reduced learning about a stimulus to which there has been prior exposure without any consequence. It therefore requires a comparison between a pre-exposed (PE) and a non-pre-exposed (NPE) condition. Since, in animals, LI is disrupted by amphetamines and enhanced by antipsychotics, LI disruption has been proposed as a measure of the characteristic attentional deficit in schizophrenia: the inability to ignore irrelevant stimuli. The findings in humans are, however, inconsistent. In particular, a recent investigation suggested that since haloperidol disrupted LI in healthy volunteers, and LI was normal in non-medicated patients with schizophrenia, the previous findings in schizophrenic patients were entirely due to the negative effects of their medication on LI (Williams et al., 1998). We conducted two studies of antipsychotic drug effects on auditory LI using a within-subject, parallel group design in healthy volunteers. In the first of these, single doses of haloperidol (1 mg. i.v.) were compared with paroxetine (20 mg p.o.) and placebo, and in the second, chlorpromazine (100 mg p.o.) was compared with lorazepam (2 mg. p.o.) and placebo. Eye movements, neuropsychological test performance (spatial working memory (SWM), Tower of London and intra/extra dimensional shift, from the CANTAB test battery) and visual analogue rating scales, were also included as other measures of attention and frontal lobe function. Haloperidol was associated with a non-significant reduction in LI scores, and dysphoria/akathisia (Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale) in three-quarters of the subjects. The LI finding may be explained by increased distractibility which was indicated by an increase in antisaccade directional errors in this group. In contrast, LI was significantly increased by chlorpromazine but not by an equally sedative dose of lorazepam (both drugs causing marked decreases in peak saccadic velocity). Paroxetine had no effect on LI, eye movements or CANTAB neuropsychological test performance. Haloperidol was associated with impaired SWM, which correlated with the degree of dysphoria/akathisia, but no other drug effects on CANTAB measures were detected. We conclude that the effect of antipsychotics on LI is both modality and pharmacologically dependent and that further research using a wider range of antipsychotic compounds is necessary to clarify the cognitive effects of these drugs, and to determine whether there are important differences between them.

Differential effects of the CCKA receptor ligands PD-140, 548 and A-71623 on latent inhibition in the rat.

Latent inhibition (LI) is a behavioural paradigm in which repeated exposure to a stimulus without consequence inhibits the formation of any new associations with that stimulus. To the extent that LI reflects a process of learning to ignore irrelevant stimuli, disrupted LI has been suggested as an animal model for the attentional deficits observed in schizophrenia. The antipsychotic potential of cholecystokinin (CCK) stems from its colocalization with dopamine (DA) in the mesolimbic pathway, where it demonstrates both excitatory and inhibitory effects on dopaminergic activity. This may be explained by mediation through different receptor subtypes. A variety of hypotheses has emerged regarding the potential clinical application of subtype-selective CCK-based drugs. The present experiments examined the effects on LI of two selective CCKA ligands: PD-140,548 (a CCKA antagonist, Experiment 1: 0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 mg/kg) and A-71623 (a CCKA agonist, Experiment 2: 0.02, 0.05, and 0.1 mg/kg). In both experiments, the effects of haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) were also investigated. Animals receiving 0.1 mg/kg of haloperidol or 0.001 or 0.1 mg/kg (but not 0.01 mg/kg) of PD-140,548 treated the preexposed stimulus as irrelevant after a low number of preexposures. In contrast, no facilitatory effect on LI was detectable at any of the A-71623 doses. The finding that A-71623 failed to enhance LI indicates that it is unlikely that this compound would have any antipsychotic effect within the clinical setting. Considering the facilitatory effect exerted by PD-140,548 on LI, it is probable that the inhibition of CCK activity might prove a more promising strategy for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia.