Context-Dependent Pharmacology Exhibited by Negative Allosteric Modulators of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 7

Phenotypic studies of mice lacking metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 7 (mGluR7) suggest that antagonists of this receptor may be promising for the treatment of central nervous system disorders such as anxiety and depression. Suzuki et al. (J Pharmacol Exp Ther 323: 147-156, 2007) recently reported the in vitro characterization of a novel mGluR7 antagonist called 6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-methyl-3-(4-pyridinyl)-isoxazolo[4,5-c]pyridin-4(5H)-one (MMPIP), which noncompetitively inhibited the activity of orthosteric and allosteric agonists at mGluR7. We describe that MMPIP acts as a noncompetitive antagonist in calcium mobilization assays in cells coexpressing mGluR7 and the promiscuous G protein G alpha(15). Assessment of the activity of a small library of MMPIP-derived compounds using this assay reveals that, despite similar potencies, compounds exhibit differences in negative co-operativity for agonist-mediated calcium mobilization. Examination of the inhibitory activity of MMPIP and analogs using endogenous G(i/o)-coupled assay readouts indicates that the pharmacology of these ligands seems to be context-dependent, and MMPIP exhibits differences in negative cooperativity in certain cellular backgrounds. Electrophysiological studies reveal that, in contrast to the orthosteric antagonist (2S)-2-amino-2-[(1S,2S)-2-carboxyclycloprop-1-yl]-3-(xanth-9-yl) propanoic acid (LY341495), MMPIP is unable to block agonist-mediated responses at the Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapse, a location at which neurotransmission has been shown to be modulated by mGluR7 activity. Thus, MMPIP and related compounds differentially inhibit coupling of mGluR7 in different cellular backgrounds and may not antagonize the coupling of this receptor to native G(i/o) signaling pathways in all cellular contexts. The pharmacology of this compound represents a striking example of the potential for context-dependent blockade of receptor responses by negative allosteric modulators.

An enantioselective imprinted receptor for Z-glutamate exhibiting a binding induced color change

Using 1-(4-styryl)-3-(3-nitrophenyl)urea as host monomer for the imprinting of Z-(D or L)-Glu, a polymeric receptor exhibiting strong enantioselectivity and a change in color intensity upon binding of the guest was obtained.

Binding site of AMPA-receptor allosteric modulator

The computer molecular docking of piperonyl acid piperidide (BDP) and some its analogs already known as ampakins was conducted for estimating their possible binding with AMPA-receptor glutamate domains in cyclothiazide binding area and for further design of new structures maximally complimentary to the receptor. On the base of the conducted docking it can be suggested that the binding site of BDP (amides of benzodioxane-6-carboxylic and piperonyl acids) analogs is located in AMPA-receptor cyclothiazide binding pocket. It is shown that formation of protein-ligand complexes of AMPA-receptor with benzodioxane-6-carboxylic and piperonyl acid derivatives, similarly to cyclothiazide, proceeds with interaction with Ser497, Leu751, which significance is confirmed by site-specific mutagenesis.

Selectivity fields: comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) of the glycine/NMDA and AMPA receptors

An approach for evaluation of binding selectivity was suggested and exemplified using glycine/NMDA and AMPA receptors. For analyzing the pairwise selectivity, we propose to use the difference between biological activities (expressed as -log Ki) of ligands with respect to different receptor subtypes as a dependent variable for building comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) models. The resulting fields (which will be referred to as the "selectivity fields") indicate the ways of increasing selectivity of binding, inhibition, etc. As an example, CoMFA of a set of pyrazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines and triazolo[1,5-c]quinazolines was used for considering the binding selectivity with respect to glycine/NMDA and AMPA receptors. In addition, the mapping of these fields onto the molecular models of the corresponding receptors makes it possible to reveal the reasons for experimentally observed selectivity as well as to suggest additional ways of increasing selectivity.