Determinants of postoperative corneal edema and impact on goldmann intraocular pressure.

PURPOSE: Recent studies report that increased corneal edema because of contact lens wear under closed lids is associated with elevated Goldmann intraocular pressure (GAT IOP). We sought to assess whether the impact of postoperative corneal edema on GAT IOP would be similar and to determine the differential effect of different amounts of edema. METHODS: The setting is a tertiary level cataract clinic in Shantou, China. Pre- and postoperative (day 1) GAT IOP, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, and radius of corneal curvature were measured for consecutive patients undergoing phacoemulsification surgery by 2 experienced surgeons. Corneal edema was calculated as the percentage increase in CCT. RESULTS: Among 136 subjects (mean age, 62.5 ± 15.4 years; 53.7% women), the mean increase in CCT was 10.3% postoperatively. Greater corneal edema was associated with lower GAT IOP in unadjusted analyses (P < 0.03) and in linear regression models (P < 0.01). In the model, higher corneal resistance factor (P < 0.001), lower corneal hysteresis (P < 0.001), and steeper radius of corneal curvature (P < 0.001) were associated with higher GAT IOP. Among subjects with edema < the median, edema was associated with lower GAT IOP (P = 0.004), whereas among those with edema ≥ the median, edema was not associated with GAT IOP. An increase in CCT of 7% was associated with an 8 mm Hg underestimation of GAT IOP in our models. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of postoperative edema on GAT IOP seems to be the opposite of contact lens-induced edema. The magnitude of the effect is potentially relevant to patient management.

Confidence in Contact: A New Perspective on Promoting Cross-Group Friendship Among Children and Adolescents

Intergroup contact theory proposes that positive interactions between members of different social groups can improve intergroup relations. Contact should be especially effective in schools, where opportunities may exist to engage cooperatively with peers from different backgrounds and develop cross-group friendships. In turn, these friendships have numerous benefits for intergroup relations. However, there is evidence that children do not always engage in cross-group friendships, often choosing to spend time with same-group peers, even in diverse settings. We argue that in order to capitalize on the potential impact of contact in schools for promoting harmonious intergroup relations, a new model is needed that places confidence in contact at its heart. We present an empirically driven theoretical model of intergroup contact that outlines the conditions that help to make young people contact ready, preparing them for successful, sustained intergroup relationships by giving them the confidence that they can engage in contact successfully. After evaluating the traditional approach to intergroup contact in schools, we present our theoretical model which outlines predictors of cross-group friendships that enhance confidence in and readiness for contact. We then discuss theory-driven, empirically tested interventions that could potentially promote confidence in contact. Finally, we make specific recommendations for practitioners and policy makers striving to promote harmonious intergroup relations in the classroom.

Paramountcy, family rights and contested adoption: does contact with birth relatives balance the scales?

This article combines practitioner insight and research evidence to chart how principles of partnership and paramountcy have led to birth family contact becoming the expected norm following contested adoption from care in Northern Ireland. The article highlights how practice has adapted to the delay in proposed reforms to adoption legislation resulting in the evolution of increasingly open adoption practices. Adoption represents an irrevocable transfer of parental responsibility from birth to adoptive parents and achieves permanence and legal security for children in care who cannot return to their birth family. Its enduring effect, however, makes public adoption a contentious field of child welfare practice, particularly when contested by birth parents. This article explores how post-adoption contact may be viewed as reconciling the uneasy interface between paramountcy principles and parental rights to respect for family life. The article highlights the complexity of adoptive kinship relationships following contested adoption from care, and how contact presents unique challenges that mitigate against meaningful and sustainable connections between the child and their birth relatives. In conclusion, a call is made for sensitive negotiation and support of contact arrangements, and the development of practice models that are informed by an understanding of the workings of adoptive kinship.