Low-grade malignant Triton tumor of the oral cavity:a case report

Malignant Triton tumor (MTT) is a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor showing rhabdomyoblastic differentiation. It is considered a high-grade neoplasm with poor outcome. This report describes an MTT appearing in the oral cavity. On histologic examination the encapsulated lesion was composed of interlacing fascicles of spindle cells and scattered, large, strap-like pleomorphic cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. No cross striations were seen. Examination of levels through the tissue showed a total of only 4 normal mitoses and no necrosis. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated diffuse S100 positivity in the spindle cells. The large pleomorphic cells were weakly positive for alpha-sarcomeric actin and myoglobin, although variably but strongly positive for desmin. Management involved a small en bloc resection of the maxilla. After 33 months there was no sign of recurrence or distant metastasis. It was concluded that low-grade variants of MTT occur that do not have an aggressive clinical course.

Bilateral non-contiguous atypical papillary glioneuronal tumor:case report

Papillary glioneuronal tumor (PGNT) was first described as a distinct clinic-pathological entity by Komori et al. in 1998. Since then it has been included as a mixed neuronal-glial tumor in the revised WHO (2007) classification of central nervous system tumors. On brain imaging, it appears as a demarcated, solid to cystic, contrast-enhancing mass usually located in the temporal lobe. Histologically, it is considered a biphasic tumor characterized by small cuboidal GFAP-positive astrocytes around hyalinised blood vessels and synaptophysin-positive interpapillary collections of neurocytes, large neurons and intermediate-sized "ganglioid cells". Although they are generally regarded as benign WHO Grade I tumors, recent reports have described more pathologically aggressive features. To date, these reports have all been single lesions.

Bilateral non-contiguous atypical papillary glioneuronal tumor: case report

Papillary glioneuronal tumor (PGNT) was first described as a distinct clinic-pathological entity by Komori et al. in 1998. Since then it has been included as a mixed neuronal-glial tumor in the revised WHO (2007) classification of central nervous system tumors. On brain imaging, it appears as a demarcated, solid to cystic, contrast-enhancing mass usually located in the temporal lobe. Histologically, it is considered a biphasic tumor characterized by small cuboidal GFAP-positive astrocytes around hyalinised blood vessels and synaptophysin-positive interpapillary collections of neurocytes, large neurons and intermediate-sized "ganglioid cells". Although they are generally regarded as benign WHO Grade I tumors, recent reports have described more pathologically aggressive features. To date, these reports have all been single lesions.

A comparison of immunohistochemical assays and FISH in detecting the ALK translocation in diagnostic histological and cytological lung tumor material.

Introduction: Detection of the ALK rearrangement in a solid tumor gives these patients the option of crizotinib as an oral form of anticancer treatment. The current test of choice is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), but various cheaper and more convenient immunohistochemical (IHC) assays have been proposed as alternatives. 
Methods: Fifteen FISH-positive cases from patients, seven with data on crizotinib therapy and clinical response, were evaluated for the presence of ALK protein using three different commercially available antibodies: D5F3, using the proprietary automated system (Ventana), ALK1 (Dako), and 5A4 (Abcam). A further 14 FISH-negative and three uncertain (<15% rearrangement detected) cases were also retrieved. Of the total 32 specimens, 17 were excisions and 15 were computed tomography-guided biopsies or cytological specimens. All three antibodies were applied to all cases. Antibodies were semiquantitatively scored on intensity, and the proportion of malignant cells stained was documented. Cutoffs were set by receiver operating curve analysis for positivity to optimize correct classification. 
Results: All three IHC assays were 100% specific but sensitivity did vary: D5F3 86%, ALK 79%, 5A4 71%. Intensity was the most discriminating measure overall, with a combination of proportion and intensity not improving the test. No FISH-negative IHC-positive cases were seen. Two FISH-positive cases were negative with all three IHC assays. One of these had been treated with crizotinib and had failed to show clinical response. The other harbored a second driving mutation in the EGFR gene.
Conclusions: IHC with all three antibodies is especially highly specific (100%) although variably sensitive (71%-86%), specifically in cases with scanty material. D5F3 assay was most sensitive in these latter cases. Occasional cases are IHC-positive but FISH-negative, suggesting either inaccuracy of one assay or occasional tumors with ALK rearrangement that do not express high levels of ALK protein.