Invention and uninvention in nuclear weapons politics

If there is one uncontroversial point in nuclear weapons politics it is that uninventing nuclear weapons is impossible. This article seeks to make this claim controversial by showing that it is premised on attenuated understandings of invention and the status of objects operative through familiar but problematic conceptual dualisms. The claimed impossibility of uninvention is an assertion that invention is irreversible. Drawing on “new materialism” this article produces a different understanding of invention, reinvention, and uninvention as ontologically similar practices of techno-political invention. On the basis of empirical material on the invention and re-invention of nuclear weapons, and an in-depth ethnography of laboratories inventing a portable radiation detector, both the process of invention and the “objects” themselves (weapons and detectors) are shown to be fragile and not wholly irreversible processes of assembling diverse actors (human and non-human) and provisionally stabilizing their relations. Nuclear weapons cannot be uninvented! Why not?

REporting and calibration of post-bomb C-14 data

The definitive paper by Stuiver and Polach (1977) established the conventions for reporting of 14C data for chronological and geophysical studies based on the radioactive decay of 14C in the sample since the year of sample death or formation. Several ways of reporting 14C activity levels relative to a standard were also established, but no specific instructions were given for reporting nuclear weapons testing (post-bomb) 14C levels in samples. Because the use of post-bomb 14C is becoming more prevalent in forensics, biology, and geosciences, a convention needs to be adopted. We advocate the use of fraction modern with a new symbol F14C to prevent confusion with the previously used Fm, which may or may not have been fractionation corrected. We also discuss the calibration of post-bomb 14C samples and the available datasets and compilations, but do not give a recommendation for a particular dataset.

Differences in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA status of high-density and low-density sperm fractions after density centrifugation preparation

Background: In order to isolate the â??bestâ?? sperm for assisted conception a discontinuous two-step density gradient centrifugation is usually employed. This technique is known to isolate a subpopulation with good motility, morphology and nuclear DNA (nDNA) integrity. As yet its ability to isolate sperm with unfragmented mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is unknown. Methods: Semen was obtained from men (n=28) attending our Regional Fertility Centre for infertility investigations. We employed a modified long polymerase chain reaction to study mtDNA and a modified alkaline Comet assay to determine nDNA fragmentation. Results: The high- density fraction displayed significantly more wild type mtDNA (75% of samples) than that of the low- density fraction (25% of samples). In the high-density fraction, there was a higher incidence of single, rather than double or multiple deletions and the deletions were predominantly small scale (0.1-4.0kb). There was a strong correlation between nDNA fragmentation, the number of mtDNA deletions (r=0.7, p

A comparison of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA status in testicular sperm from fertile men and those with obstructive azoospermia

Background: Mitochondria are vital to sperm as their motility powerhouses. They are also the only animal organelles with their own unique genome; encoding subunits for the complexes required for the electron transfer chain. Methods: A modified long PCR technique was used to study mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in ejaculated and testicular sperm samples from fertile men (n=11) and testicular sperm from men with obstructive azoospermia (n=25). Nuclear DNA fragmentation was measured by an alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (COMET) assay. Results: Wild-type mtDNA was detected in only 60% of fertile mens�??�?�¢?? testicular sperm, 50% of their ejaculated sperm and 46% of testicular sperm from men with obstructive azoospermia. The incidence of mitochondrial deletions in testicular sperm of fertile and infertile men was not significantly different but the mean size of the deletions was significantly less in testicular sperm from fertile men compared with men with obstructive azoospermia (p<0.02). Nuclear DNA fragmentation in testicular sperm from fertile men and men with obstructive azoospermia was not significantly different. Conclusion: Multiple mtDNA deletions are common in testicular and ejaculated sperm from both fertile and infertile men. However, in males with obstructive azoospermia the mtDNA deletions in testicular sperm are of a larger scale.