1 resultado para Westminster Confession of Faith
em QSpace: Queen's University - Canada
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (4)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (6)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (10)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (7)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (22)
- Boston University Digital Common (14)
- Brock University, Canada (10)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (25)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (4)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (9)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Harvard University (19)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (19)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (5)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (50)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (53)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (10)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (48)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (16)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (4)
- University of Michigan (279)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (11)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (174)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
The article describes the nearly year-long political and media uproar that followed on the release in January, 2000 of a qualitative or soft “audit” of management control in the federal government department, Human Resources Development Canada, and analyses the contributing factors. The article argues that the auditors’ examination of project files for programs delivered by grants and contributions was so abstract and poorly executed that nothing whatever can be concluded from the work. Factors that favoured the “scandal” interpretation include across-government New Public Management reforms where accountability has not been re-theorized for Canada’s Westminster system of government; Canada’s electoral volatility that starves the country of experienced politicians and spurs the tradition of political compensation for electoral support; and the political role of the Office of the Auditor General. This paper has been accepted for publication by the journal Critical Perspectives on Accounting, which holds copyright.