Adding Run-Time Monitoring to UML-RT by Modifying the Papyrus-RT Code Generator

In Model-Driven Engineering (MDE), the developer creates a model using a language such as Unified Modeling Language (UML) or UML for Real-Time (UML-RT) and uses tools such as Papyrus or Papyrus-RT that generate code for them based on the model they create. Tracing allows developers to get insights such as which events occur and timing information into their own application as it runs. We try to add monitoring capabilities using Linux Trace Toolkit: next generation (LTTng) to models created in UML-RT using Papyrus-RT. The implementation requires changing the code generator to add tracing statements for the events that the user wants to monitor to the generated code. We also change the makefile to automate the build process and we create an Extensible Markup Language (XML) file that allows developers to view their traces visually using Trace Compass, an Eclipse-based trace viewing tool. Finally, we validate our results using three models we create and trace.

The role of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cdc2 phosphorylation sites on Cdc25 in mitotic timing

Cell size control and mitotic timing in Schizosaccharomyces pombe is coupled to the environment through several signal transduction pathways that include stress response, checkpoint and nutritional status impinging on Cdc25 tyrosine phosphatase and Wee1 tyrosine kinase. These in turn regulate Cdc2 (Cdk1) activity and through a double feedback loop, further activates Cdc25 on 12 possible phosphorylation sites as well as inhibiting Wee1. Phosphomutants of the T89 Cdc2 phosphorylation site on Cdc25, one with a glutamate substitution (T89E) which is known to phosphomimetically activate proteins and an alanine substitution (T89A), which is known to block phosphorylation, exhibit a small steady-state cell size (semi-wee phenotype), a known hallmark for aberrant mitotic control. To determine whether the T89 phosphorylation site plays an integral role in mitotic timing, the phosphomutants were subjected to nitrogen shifts to analyze their transient response in the context of nutritional control. Results for both up and downshifts were replicated for the T89E phosphomutant, however, for the T89A phosphomutant, only a nutritional downshift has been completed so far. We found that the steady-state cell size of both phosphomutants was significantly smaller than the wild-type and in the context of nutritional control. Furthermore, the constitutively activated T89E phosphomutant exhibits residual mitotic entry, whereas the wild-type undergoes a complete mitotic suppression with mitotic recovery also occurring earlier than the wild-type. In response to downshifts, both phosphomutants exhibited an identical response to the wild-type. Further characterization of the other Cdc2 phosphorylation sites on Cdc25 are required before conclusions can be drawn, however T89 remains a strong candidate for being important in activating Cdc25.