Lost in Translation? Russian Media Portrayals and Laypersons’ Interpretations of Angelina Jolie’s Breast Cancer Discourse

In May 2013, Angelina Jolie revealed that because she had a family history of breast and ovarian cancer and carried a rare BRCA gene mutation, she had undergone a preventive double mastectomy. Media coverage has been extensive around the world, including in Russia, not an English-language country, where all global news is inevitably filtered by translation. After examining the reactions of Russian mass media and members of the public to Jolie’s disclosure, I consider what transformations have occurred with Jolie’s message in the process of cross-cultural transfer. I explore the mass media portrayal of Jolie’s announcement, laypersons’ immediate and prolonged reactions, and the reflections of patients involved directly in the field of hereditary breast cancer. To my knowledge, this multifaceted and bilingual project is the first conceptualization of Jolie’s story as it has been translated in a different sociocultural environment. I start with examination of offline and online publications that appeared in Russia within two months after Jolie’s announcement. In this part of my analysis, I conceptualize the representation of Jolie’s case in Russian mass media and grasp what sociocultural waves were generated by this case among general lay audiences. Another part of my study contains the results of qualitative in-depth interviews. Eight women with a family history of hereditary breast cancer were recruited to participate in the research. The findings represent Jolie’s case through the eyes of Russian women with the same gene mutation as Jolie. Consolidating my findings, I argue that Jolie’s announcement was misinterpreted and misrepresented by Russian mass media, as well as misunderstood by a considerable part of the media audience. Jolie’s perspective on hereditary breast cancer mostly remained unheard among members of the Russian public. I make suggestions about the reasons for such a phenomenon, and demonstrate how Jolie’s case is implicated in politics, economics, and the culture of contemporary Russia.

CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing of ARG1 in Cell Lines and Primary Cells

Arginase 1 deficiency, a urea cycle disorder resulting from an inability of the body to convert arginine into urea, results in hyperargininemia and sporadic episodes of hyperammonemia. Arginase 1 deficiency can lead to a range of developmental disorders and progressive spastic diplegia in children, and current therapeutic options are limited. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) /CRISPR associated protein (Cas) 9 gene editing systems serve as a novel means of treating genetic disorders such as Arginase 1 (ARG1) deficiency, and must be thoroughly examined to determine their curative capabilities. In these experiments numerous guide RNAs and CRISPR/Cas9 systems targeting the ARG1 gene were designed and observed by heteroduplex assay for their targeting capabilities and cleavage efficiencies in multiple cell lines. The CRISPR/Cas9 system utilized in these experiments, along with a panel of guide RNAs targeting various locations in the arginase 1 gene, successfully produced targeted cleavage in HEK293, MCF7, A549, K562, HeLa, and HepG2 cells; however, targeted cleavage in human dermal fibroblasts, blood outgrowth endothelial cells, and induced pluripotent stem cells was not observed. Additionally, a CRISPR/Cas system involving partially inactivated Cas9 was capable of producing targeted DNA cleavage in intron 1 of ARG1, while a Cas protein termed Cpf1 was incapable of producing targeted cleavage. These results indicate a complex set of variables determining the CRISPR/Cas9 systems’ capabilities in the cell lines and primary cells tested. By examining epigenetic factors and alternative CRISPR/Cas9 gene targeting systems, the CRISPR/Cas9 system can be more thoroughly considered in its ability to act as a means towards editing the genome of arginase 1-deficient individuals.