Arp2p, a potential substrate for NatB acetyltransferase in fission yeast, is important in actin patch nucleation and motility in arp2-1 and arm1 ts mutants

The actin cytoskeleton is a dynamic and complex structure in fission yeast that plays a major function in many cell processes including cellular growth, septa formation, endocytosis and cellular division. Computational studies have shown that Arp2p, which forms part of the Arp2/3 complex, is a potential substrate of NatB acetyltransferase which has specificity for proteins possessing an N-terminal Met-Asp or Met-Glu sequence motif. In arm1- mutants the loss of function of Arm1p, an auxillary subunit required for NatB activity, results in a temperature sensitive phenotype characterized by multiple septa, failure of endocytosis, and the inability to form actin cables. A temperature sensitive mutant of Schizosaccharomyces pombe arp2 gene exhibits a similar phenotype as seen by the formation of improper septa, slow growth, and the delocalization of actin patches. Four expression vectors encoding the open reading frames of arp2 and cdc8 (tropomyosin) were constructed with a modification changing the second residue to a Histidine, believed to mimic the charge distribution of natural acetylation by NatB. Constructs tested in normal yeast strains remained viable and grew normally in the presence of Met-His Arp2p and tropomyosin. Analysis of their ability to suppress the mutant phenotypes of arp2-1 and arm1- mutants is an area of research to be explored in future studies.

Two-hybrid analysis of the interaction between the fission yeast proteins Sal3 and Cdc25

Cdc25 is a mitosis triggering phosphatase in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and is transported in to the nucleus during G2 phase by the importin-β protein Sal3. Cdc25 triggers mitosis and cell division by dephosphorylating tyrosine 15 of Cdc2. In sal3 mutants, Cdc25 is not transported into the nucleus and the cells halt in G2. The purpose of this study is to use a two-hybrid system to determine the nature of the relationship between Sal3 and Cdc25. Previous research has failed to detect any interaction between the two proteins, but specific modifications were made to the two-hybrid system in this study including the separation of Sal3 into its two binding domains, the addition of fluorescent tags to the fusion protein, and the reversal of plasmids in the fusion proteins. Unique PCR primers were successfully designed, based on a multiple alignment of Sal3 and its homologues, to separate Sal3 into its two domains.

Functional characterization of a Kar3/Vik1-like Kinesin-14 heterodimer from the filamentous multinucleate fungus Ashbya gossypii

Kinesins are motor proteins that convert chemical energy from ATP hydrolysis into mechanical energy used to generate force along microtubules, transporting organelles, vesicles, and proteins within the cell. Kar3 kinesins are microtubule minus-end-directed motors with pleiotropic functions in mating and mitosis of budding and fission yeast. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Kar3 is multifunctionalized by two non-catalytic companion proteins, Vik1 and Cik1. A Kar3-like kinesin and a single Vik1/Cik1 ortholog are also expressed by the filamentous fungus Ashbya gossypii, which exhibits different nuclear movement challenges and unique microtubule dynamics from its yeast relatives. We hypothesized that these differences in A. gossypii physiology could translate into interesting and novel differences in its versions of Kar3 and Vik1/Cik1. Presented here is a structural and functional analysis of recombinantly expressed and purified forms of these motor proteins. Compared to the previously published S. cerevisiae Kar3 motor domain structure (ScKar3MD), AgKar3MD displays differences in the conformation of the ATPase pocket. Perhaps it is not surprising then that we observed the maximal microtubule-stimulated ATPase rate (kcat) of AgKar3MD to be approximately 3-fold slower than ScKar3MD, and that the affinity of AgKar3MD for microtubules (Kd,MT) was lower than ScKar3MD. This may suggest that elements that compose the ATPase pocket and that participate in conformational changes required for efficient ATP hydrolysis or products release work differently for AgKar3 and ScKar3. There are also subtle structural differences in the disposition of the secondary structural elements in the small lobe (B1a, B1b, and B1c) at the edge of the motor domain of AgKar3 that may reflect the enhanced microtubule-depolymerization activity that we observed for this motor, or they could relate to its interactions with a different regulatory companion protein than its budding yeast counterpart. Although we were unable to gain experimentally determined high-resolution information of AgVik1, the results of Phyre2-based bioinformatics analyses may provide a structural explanation for the limited microtubule-binding activity we observed. These and other fundamental differences in AgKar3/Vik1 could explain divergent functionalities from the ScKar3/Vik1 and ScKar3/Cik1 motor assemblies.