1 resultado para Parliamentary technology assessment
em Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (3)
- Aberdeen University (14)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (2)
- Aquatic Commons (14)
- Archive of European Integration (7)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (26)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (12)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (27)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Brunel University (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (24)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (32)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (26)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (5)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (7)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (12)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (19)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (7)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (5)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (57)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (252)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (5)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (20)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (28)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (11)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (152)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (18)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
Resumo:
this paper is about EU “soft policies” on immigrant integration. It analyzes the “Common Basic Principles” (CBPs) and the “European Integration Fund” (EIF), two devices that have been recently established within this framework. It adopts the theoretical perspective of the “anthropology of policy” and “governmentality studies”. It shows the context of birth of the aforementioned devices, as well as their functioning and the assessment done by the actors implied in the elaboration/implementation/evaluation of the related policies. It is based both on documentary research as well as direct observation and interviews done to the actors implied. It concludes that the PBC and the EIF should be considered as a “technology of government”, that strives to align the conduct of the actors with the governmental aims, as well as it produces specific practices and knowledge. It also underlines an intrinsic feature of many policies: their “congenital failure”, since they are (often) disputed and resignified by situated actors, who are embedded in asymmetrical power relations.