1 resultado para negative feedback
em Open University Netherlands
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (12)
- Repository Napier (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (7)
- Aston University Research Archive (11)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (11)
- Boston University Digital Common (7)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (12)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (171)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (32)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (4)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (136)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (4)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (15)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (7)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (13)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (123)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (26)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (3)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (17)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (29)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (212)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (9)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (3)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (6)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of training tutors in content knowledge of a particular domain versus training them in tutoring skills of pedagogical knowledge when tutoring on a complex tutee task. Forty-seven tutor-tutee pairs of fourth year secondary school students were created and assigned to one of two treatments. Twenty-two tutors received training in content knowledge and the other twenty-five tutors in tutoring skills. Tutors formulated written feedback immediately after the training. Tutees first interpreted the tutor feedback and then used it to revise their research questions. The results showed that tutors trained in tutoring skills formulated more effective feedback than tutors trained in content knowledge. In addition, tutees helped by tutoring-skills tutors found the feedback more motivating than those helped by content- knowledge tutors. However, no differences were found in tutee performance on revision. The findings are discussed in terms of the set-up of this study and implications for improving the effectiveness of peer tutoring.