Unraveling networked learning initiatives: an analytic framework

Networked learning happens naturally within the social systems of which we are all part. However, in certain circumstances individuals may want to actively take initiative to initiate interaction with others they are not yet regularly in exchange with. This may be the case when external influences and societal changes require innovation of existing practices. This paper proposes a framework with relevant dimensions providing insight into precipitated characteristics of designed as well as ‘fostered or grown’ networked learning initiatives. Networked learning initiatives are characterized as “goal-directed, interest-, or needs based activities of a group of (at least three) individuals that initiate interaction across the boundaries of their regular social systems”. The proposed framework is based on two existing research traditions, namely 'networked learning' and 'learning networks', comparing, integrating and building upon knowledge from both perspectives. We uncover some interesting differences between definitions, but also similarities in the way they describe what ‘networked’ means and how learning is conceptualized. We think it is productive to combine both research perspectives, since they both study the process of learning in networks extensively, albeit from different points of view, and their combination can provide valuable insights in networked learning initiatives. We uncover important features of networked learning initiatives, characterize actors and connections of which they are comprised and conditions which facilitate and support them. The resulting framework could be used both for analytic purposes and (partly) as a design framework. In this framework it is acknowledged that not all successful networks have the same characteristics: there is no standard ‘constellation’ of people, roles, rules, tools and artefacts, although there are indications that some network structures work better than others. Interactions of individuals can only be designed and fostered till a certain degree: the type of network and its ‘growth’ (e.g. in terms of the quantity of people involved, or the quality and relevance of co-created concepts, ideas, artefacts and solutions to its ‘inhabitants’) is in the hand of the people involved. Therefore, the framework consists of dimensions on a sliding scale. It introduces a structured and analytic way to look at the precipitation of networked learning initiatives: learning networks. Successive research on the application of this framework and feedback from the networked learning community is needed to further validate it’s usability and value to both research as well as practice.

Unraveling networked learning initiatives: an analytic framework

Networked learning happens naturally within the social systems of which we are all part. However, in certain circumstances individuals may want to actively take initiative to initiate interaction with others they are not yet regularly in exchange with. This may be the case when external influences and societal changes require innovation of existing practices. This paper proposes a framework with relevant dimensions providing insight into precipitated characteristics of designed as well as ‘fostered or grown’ networked learning initiatives. Networked learning initiatives are characterized as “goal-directed, interest-, or needs based activities of a group of (at least three) individuals that initiate interaction across the boundaries of their regular social systems”. The proposed framework is based on two existing research traditions, namely 'networked learning' and 'learning networks', comparing, integrating and building upon knowledge from both perspectives. We uncover some interesting differences between definitions, but also similarities in the way they describe what ‘networked’ means and how learning is conceptualized. We think it is productive to combine both research perspectives, since they both study the process of learning in networks extensively, albeit from different points of view, and their combination can provide valuable insights in networked learning initiatives. We uncover important features of networked learning initiatives, characterize actors and connections of which they are comprised and conditions which facilitate and support them. The resulting framework could be used both for analytic purposes and (partly) as a design framework. In this framework it is acknowledged that not all successful networks have the same characteristics: there is no standard ‘constellation’ of people, roles, rules, tools and artefacts, although there are indications that some network structures work better than others. Interactions of individuals can only be designed and fostered till a certain degree: the type of network and its ‘growth’ (e.g. in terms of the quantity of people involved, or the quality and relevance of co-created concepts, ideas, artefacts and solutions to its ‘inhabitants’) is in the hand of the people involved. Therefore, the framework consists of dimensions on a sliding scale. It introduces a structured and analytic way to look at the precipitation of networked learning initiatives: learning networks. Successive research on the application of this framework and feedback from the networked learning community is needed to further validate it’s usability and value to both research as well as practice.

Veranderende rol van de controller. Balans tussen het toepassen van hard en soft controls

Het doel van dit onderzoek is om inzicht te geven in de ontwikkeling van de rol van de controller en te onderzoeken hoe de rol van de controller zich verhoudt tot het gebruik van hard en soft controls. Het onderzoek is uitgevoerd in de vorm van een case study waarbij de onderzoeksdata op twee manieren is verzameld. Ten eerste is door middel van desk research op basis van brondocumenten een overzicht in de tijd gemaakt van de gehanteerde management control systemen bij de casusorganisatie, zijnde vier lokale Rabobank vestigingen. Ten tweede is voor het beantwoorden van de deelvragen en hoofdvraag gebruik gemaakt van semigestructureerde interviews. De ontwikkelingen binnen management control laten zien dat de invulling hiervan bij de casusorganisatie veranderd is en dat management control niet meer alleen vraagt om hard controls. In de casusorganisatie zijn de hard controls duidelijk ingericht en laten de onderzoeksresultaten zien dat soft controls wel worden uitgevoerd maar niet concreet zijn geformuleerd en ingericht. Ten aanzien van het toepassen van hard of soft controls blijkt dat de nadruk ligt op hard controls. De verhouding lijkt samen te hangen met de verschillen in inrichting van de control afdeling en fase waarin de vier verschillende lokale banken zich bevinden. De ontwikkeling die reeds heeft plaatsgevonden en de verwachte ontwikkelingen ten aanzien van de taken van de controller en het toepassen van het type controls, duiden op een verschuiving van traditioneel controlewerk naar een controller die steeds meer betrokken is bij de business en gesprekspartner is van management en directie. De rol van de controller heeft zich doorontwikkeld en is veranderd van achteraf controle uitvoeren (controleur-rol) naar een veel bredere partner-rol die ook aan de voorkant met de business probeert mee te denken en management en directie ondersteunt bij organisatieveranderingen. Het bewustzijn ten aanzien van het inzetten van verschillende type controls, passend bij de doelstelling en situatie, is de laatste jaren toegenomen. Naast sturing op resultaat-, vindt nu ook actiesturen en medewerker- en leiderschapssturing plaats. De rol van de controller is over tijd veranderd, maar er heeft geen duidelijke verschuiving plaatsgevonden in het toepassen van het type controls van hard naar soft.

Designing networked learning for innovation: A dimension perspective

In her presentation, Emmy discusses a case study where a teacher group is followed in its innovative attempt to start up a new curriculum. Searching for guidelines to facilitate knowledge-creating teacher groups, the ‘Dimensions of Social Learning (DSL) Framework’ is applied as a starting point to assess the group's social configuration. To supplement the DSL Framework towards knowledge creation, social capital and value creation theories were studied. This has resulted in an extended framework that can bring the knowledge creation of teacher groups into view.