1 resultado para COPE Questionnaire
em Open University Netherlands
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- Archive of European Integration (4)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (17)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (11)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (6)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (2)
- Bioline International (4)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (68)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (27)
- Centro Hospitalar do Porto (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (8)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (2)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (6)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (7)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (7)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (30)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (56)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (66)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (186)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico da Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (5)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (1)
- REPOSITORIO DIGITAL IMARPE - INSTITUTO DEL MAR DEL PERÚ, Peru (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (30)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (3)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Scielo España (7)
- Universidad de Alicante (7)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (7)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (4)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (9)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (22)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (4)
- University of Michigan (19)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (26)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
Abstract The number of students engaged in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) is increasing rapidly. Due to the autonomy of students in this type of education, students in MOOCs are required to regulate their learning to a greater extent than students in traditional, face-to-face education. However, there is no questionnaire available suited for this online context that measures all aspects of self-regulated learning (SRL). In this study, such a questionnaire is developed based on existing SRL questionnaires. This is the self-regulated online learning ques- tionnaire. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on the first dataset led to a set of scales differing from those theoretically defined beforehand. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted on a second dataset to compare the fit of the theoretical model and the exploratively obtained model. The exploratively obtained model provided much better fit to the data than the theoretical model. All models under investigation provided better fit when excluding the task strategies scale and when merging the scales measuring metacognitive activities. From the results of the EFA and the CFA it can be concluded that further development of the questionnaire is necessary.