1 resultado para human genetic enhancement
em Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (11)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (6)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (8)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (32)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (24)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (86)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (40)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (32)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (46)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Duke University (28)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (37)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (12)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (3)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (139)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (57)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (147)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (99)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (11)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (19)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (9)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (9)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
An intriguing question, which until recently had not been directly explored by the courts, is the extent to which English law recognises body parts and products of the human body as property capable of ownership. Although the common law currently recognises no general property in a dead body (and only limited possessory rights in respect of it), this apparent “no-property rule” provides no justification, it is submitted, for denying proprietary status to parts or products of a living human body. The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Yearworth v. North Bristol NHS Trust ([2009] EWCA Civ 37) lends strong support to the view that genetic material (as the product of a living human body) is capable of ownership, at least in the context of a claim in the tort of negligence and bailment. This article examines the various issues by reference to both English and Commonwealth authority.