Three parallel programming paradigms: Comparisons on an archetypal PDE computation

Three paradigms for distributed-memory parallel computation that free the application programmer from the details of message passing are compared for an archetypal structured scientific computation -- a nonlinear, structured-grid partial differential equation boundary value problem -- using the same algorithm on the same hardware. All of the paradigms -- parallel languages represented by the Portland Group's HPF, (semi-)automated serial-to-parallel source-to-source translation represented by CAP-Tools from the University of Greenwich, and parallel libraries represented by Argonne's PETSc -- are found to be easy to use for this problem class, and all are reasonably effective in exploiting concurrency after a short learning curve. The level of involvement required by the application programmer under any paradigm includes specification of the data partitioning, corresponding to a geometrically simple decomposition of the domain of the PDE. Programming in SPMD style for the PETSc library requires writing only the routines that discretize the PDE and its Jacobian, managing subdomain-to-processor mappings (affine global-to-local index mappings), and interfacing to library solver routines. Programming for HPF requires a complete sequential implementation of the same algorithm as a starting point, introduction of concurrency through subdomain blocking (a task similar to the index mapping), and modest experimentation with rewriting loops to elucidate to the compiler the latent concurrency. Programming with CAPTools involves feeding the same sequential implementation to the CAPTools interactive parallelization system, and guiding the source-to-source code transformation by responding to various queries about quantities knowable only at runtime. Results representative of "the state of the practice" for a scaled sequence of structured grid problems are given on three of the most important contemporary high-performance platforms: the IBM SP, the SGI Origin 2000, and the CRAYY T3E.

Modelling continuum mechanics phenomena using three dimensional unstructured meshes on massively parallel processors

The difficulties encountered in implementing large scale CM codes on multiprocessor systems are now fairly well understood. Despite the claims of shared memory architecture manufacturers to provide effective parallelizing compilers, these have not proved to be adequate for large or complex programs. Significant programmer effort is usually required to achieve reasonable parallel efficiencies on significant numbers of processors. The paradigm of Single Program Multi Data (SPMD) domain decomposition with message passing, where each processor runs the same code on a subdomain of the problem, communicating through exchange of messages, has for some time been demonstrated to provide the required level of efficiency, scalability, and portability across both shared and distributed memory systems, without the need to re-author the code into a new language or even to support differing message passing implementations. Extension of the methods into three dimensions has been enabled through the engineering of PHYSICA, a framework for supporting 3D, unstructured mesh and continuum mechanics modeling. In PHYSICA, six inspectors are used. Part of the challenge for automation of parallelization is being able to prove the equivalence of inspectors so that they can be merged into as few as possible.