JOSTLE: multilevel graph partitioning software: an overview

In this chapter we look at JOSTLE, the multilevel graph-partitioning software package, and highlight some of the key research issues that it addresses. We first outline the core algorithms and place it in the context of the multilevel refinement paradigm. We then look at issues relating to its use as a tool for parallel processing and, in particular, partitioning in parallel. Since its first release in 1995, JOSTLE has been used for many mesh-based parallel scientific computing applications and so we also outline some enhancements such as multiphase mesh-partitioning, heterogeneous mapping and partitioning to optimise subdomain shape

Multilevel refinement strategies for the capacity vehicle routing problem

We discuss the application of the multilevel (ML) refinement technique to the Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP), and compare it to its single-level (SL) counterpart. Multilevel refinement recursively coarsens to create a hierarchy of approximations to the problem and refines at each level. A SL algorithm, which uses a combination of standard VRP heuristics, is developed first to solve instances of the VRP. A ML version, which extends the global view of these heuristics, is then created, using variants of the construction and improvement heuristics at each level. Finally some multilevel enhancements are developed. Experimentation is used to find suitable parameter settings and the final version is tested on two well-known VRP benchmark suites. Results comparing both SL and ML algorithms are presented.

The application of multilevel refinement to the vehicle routing problem

We discuss the application of the multilevel (ML) refinement technique to the Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP), and compare it to its single-level (SL) counterpart. Multilevel refinement recursively coarsens to create a hierarchy of approximations to the problem and refines at each level. A SL heuristic, termed the combined node-exchange composite heuristic (CNCH), is developed first to solve instances of the VRP. A ML version (the ML-CNCH) is then created, using the construction and improvement heuristics of the CNCH at each level. Experimentation is used to find a suitable combination, which extends the global view of these heuristics. Results comparing both SL and ML are presented.

Multilevel refinement for combinatorial optimisation: boosting metaheuristic performance

The multilevel paradigm as applied to combinatorial optimisation problems is a simple one, which at its most basic involves recursive coarsening to create a hierarchy of approximations to the original problem. An initial solution is found, usually at the coarsest level, and then iteratively refined at each level, coarsest to finest, typically by using some kind of heuristic optimisation algorithm (either a problem-specific local search scheme or a metaheuristic). Solution extension (or projection) operators can transfer the solution from one level to another. As a general solution strategy, the multilevel paradigm has been in use for many years and has been applied to many problem areas (for example multigrid techniques can be viewed as a prime example of the paradigm). Overview papers such as [] attest to its efficacy. However, with the exception of the graph partitioning problem, multilevel techniques have not been widely applied to combinatorial problems and in this chapter we discuss recent developments. In this chapter we survey the use of multilevel combinatorial techniques and consider their ability to boost the performance of (meta)heuristic optimisation algorithms.

Multilevel approaches applied to the capacitated clustering problem

This paper presents two multilevel refinement algorithms for the capacitated clustering problem. Multilevel refinement is a collaborative technique capable of significantly aiding the solution process for optimisation problems. The central methodologies of the technique are filtering solutions from the search space and reducing the level of problem detail to be considered at each level of the solution process. The first multilevel algorithm uses a simple tabu search while the other executes a standard local search procedure. Both algorithms demonstrate that the multilevel technique is capable of aiding the solution process for this combinatorial optimisation problem.