Keeping the promise? Contextualizing inclusive education in developing countries

Inclusive education became a global promise corroborated by international declarations such as the Salamanca Statement (1994) and the Incheon Declaration (2015). Most countries worldwide have committed to the goal of inclusive education, putting a lot of pressure on so-called developing countries. Against this backdrop the threefold purpose of this book is to: 1. Generate research evidence on the development and implementation of inclusive education in developing countries, 2. Contextualize inclusive education in specific developing countries and contexts, and 3. Reflect on the future of inclusive education in developing countries. (DIPF/Orig.)

Herausforderung Inklusion? Ein mehrperspektivischer Blick auf die JeKi-Praxis an Schulen mit gemeinsamem Unterricht (GU)

[Der Beitrag nähert sich der Frage], ob die aktuelle JeKi-Praxis günstige Voraussetzungen für die erweiterte Einführung inklusiver Settings bietet und wie die bestehenden Ansätze eines inklusiven JeKi-Unterrichts in Grundschulen mit gemeinsamem Unterricht eingeschätzt werden können. [...] Für jede dieser Ebenen wurden in der Studie „JeKi und gemeinsamer Unterricht" ausgewählte Fragestellungen untersucht, in der vorliegenden Darstellung sollen zwei Aspekte im Vordergrund stehen, die der innerpsychischen und der institutionellen Ebene zugeordnet werden können. (DIPF/Orig.)

The sources of inequity in the education system of Serbia and how to combat them

The concept of equal opportunity for all students is deeply embedded in the Serbian constitution and in education laws. On that level, there is no doubt that everyone is ensured an opportunity to receive quality education. Many measures in education policy have been created specifically to achieve this objective and make the system fair and inclusive. The Coleman Report was linked to a wave of optimism that certain educational measures would help in achieving these noble goals. This aim is a high priority in education in a democratic country, and due to its importance needs to be re-examined. Thus, the present research examines the equity of students in the Serbian education system, detecting areas on all educational levels that could be (or already are) systemic sources of inequity (e.g., criteria for preschool institution enrolment, the system of student awards, rationalisation of the school network, the concept of entrance exams to secondary school or university, etc.). A number of measures have already been taken in the system specifically to deal with inequity (e.g., the Preschool Preparatory Programme, dropout measures, inclusion, scholarships, etc.). The effects of these measures in particular are analysed in the present work. In addition to an analysis of the systemic sources of inequity in the Serbian education system, the article also makes recommendations for their overcoming. (DIPF/Orig.)