1 resultado para constructivist grounded theory
em Ecology and Society
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (50)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (48)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (10)
- Brock University, Canada (27)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (20)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (10)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (14)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (7)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (12)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (8)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (54)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (5)
- Duke University (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (3)
- Glasgow Theses Service (3)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (3)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (21)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (4)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (4)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (12)
- Memorial University Research Repository (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (6)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (7)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (5)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (10)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (6)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (20)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (5)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (45)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (8)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (23)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (4)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (39)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (7)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade do Minho (5)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (7)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (2)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (8)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (12)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (56)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Innsbruck Digital Library - Austria (1)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (170)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (8)
Resumo:
In the mega-diverse country Peru, a resource intensive development model collides with the interest of conserving biodiversity. Peruvian biodiversity experts have developed different lines of argumentation as to how to integrate conservation into the sustainable development of their country. Applying grounded theory, I define five groups of conservation narratives based on the analysis of 72 qualitative interviews with experts working in areas of biodiversity conservation. I have labeled them: biodiversity protectionists, biodiversity traditionalists, biodiversity localists, biodiversity pragmatists, and biodiversity capitalists. These groups are each discussed in connection with what they have to say about biodiversity in relation to human life, valuation and knowledge systems, participation and leadership, substitutability of natural capital, and its predominant political strategy. In a second step, a comparative analysis of the dominant and diverging political perspectives is made. I argue that by deconstructing underlying premises and ideologies, common ground and possible opportunities for collaboration can be identified. Moreover, although the presented results can serve as a discussion scaffold to organize conservation debates in Peru, this example demonstrates how the terms biodiversity and sustainability are operationalized in conservation narratives.