1 resultado para challenges of managing pain
em Ecology and Society
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (6)
- Archive of European Integration (24)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (32)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (17)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (81)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (10)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (48)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (28)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (5)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (9)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (6)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (9)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (76)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (210)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (2)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (3)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (30)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (3)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (7)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (6)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (6)
- University of Connecticut - USA (4)
- University of Michigan (5)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (38)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
There is an increasing emphasis on the restoration of ecosystem services as well as of biodiversity, especially where restoration projects are planned at a landscape scale. This increase in the diversity of restoration aims has a number of conceptual and practical implications for the way that restoration projects are monitored and evaluated. Landscape-scale projects require monitoring of not only ecosystem services and biodiversity but also of ecosystem processes since these can underpin both. Using the experiences gained at a landscape-scale wetland restoration project in the UK, we discuss a number of issues that need to be considered, including the choice of metrics for monitoring ecosystem services and the difficulties of assessing the interactions between ecosystem processes, biodiversity, and ecosystem services. Particular challenges that we identify, using two pilot data sets, include the decoupling of monetary metrics used for monitoring ecosystem services from biophysical change on the ground and the wide range of factors external to a project that influence the monitoring results. We highlight the fact that the wide range of metrics necessary to evaluate the ecosystem service, ecosystem process, and biodiversity outcomes of landscape-scale projects presents a number of practical challenges, including the need for high levels of varied expertise, high costs, incommensurate monitoring outputs, and the need for careful management of monitoring results, especially where they may be used in making decisions about the relative importance of project aims.