1 resultado para VULNERABILITIES
em Ecology and Society
Filtro por publicador
- University of Cagliari UniCA Eprints (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (6)
- Archive of European Integration (5)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (6)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (12)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (9)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (5)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (17)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (71)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (3)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (3)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (27)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (55)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (13)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (5)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (25)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (3)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (7)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (9)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (12)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (3)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Inland flood risks are defined by a range of environmental and social factors, including land use and floodplain management. Shifting patterns of storm intensity and precipitation, attributed to climate change, are exacerbating flood risk in regions across North America. Strategies for adapting to growing flood risks and climate change must account for a community’s specific vulnerabilities, and its local economic, environmental, and social conditions. Through a stakeholder-engaged methodology, we designed an interactive decision exercise to enable stakeholders to evaluate alternatives for addressing specific community flood vulnerabilities. We used a multicriteria framework to understand what drives stakeholder preferences for flood mitigation and adaptation alternatives, including ecosystem-based projects. Results indicated strong preferences for some ecosystem-based projects that utilize natural capital, generated a useful discussion on the role of individual values in driving decisions and a critique of local environmental and hazard planning procedure, and uncovered support for a river management alternative that had previously been considered socially infeasible. We conclude that a multicriteria decision framework may help ensure that the multiple benefit qualities of natural capital projects are considered by decision makers. Application of a utility function can demonstrate the role of individual decision-maker values in decision outcomes and help illustrate why one alternative may be a better choice than another. Although designing an efficient and accurate multicriteria exercise is quite challenging and often data intensive, we imagine that this method is applicable elsewhere. It may be especially suitable to group decisions that involve varying levels of expertise and competing values, as is often the case in planning for the ecological and human impacts of climate change.