1 resultado para Stowe, Harriet Beecher, 1811-1896--Criticism and interpretation
em Ecology and Society
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (5)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (7)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (5)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (12)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (10)
- Aston University Research Archive (13)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad del Valle - Colombia (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (27)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (2)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (39)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (5)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (12)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (32)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (21)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (5)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (13)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (8)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (104)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (4)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (5)
- Duke University (4)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (4)
- Harvard University (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (25)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (11)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (14)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (10)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (9)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (62)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (80)
- Repositório Científico da Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (9)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Vicerrectoría de Investigación de la Universidad de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (15)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (22)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (4)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (11)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (5)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (11)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (5)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (85)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (23)
- University of Washington (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
A rise in qualitative social science manuscripts published in ecology and conservation journals speaks to the growing awareness of the importance of the human dimension in maintaining and improving Earth’s ecosystems. Given the rise in the quantity of qualitative social science research published in ecology and conservation journals, it is worthwhile quantifying the extent to which this research is meeting established criteria for research design, conduct, and interpretation. Through a comprehensive review of this literature, we aimed to gather and assess data on the nature and extent of information presented on research design published qualitative research articles, which could be used to judge research quality. Our review was based on 146 studies from across nine ecology and conservation journals. We reviewed and summarized elements of quality that could be used by reviewers and readers to evaluate qualitative research (dependability, credibility, confirmability, and transferability); assessed the prevalence of these elements in research published in ecology and conservation journals; and explored the implications of sound qualitative research reporting for applying research findings. We found that dependability and credibility were reasonably well reported, albeit poorly evolved in relation to critical aspects of qualitative social science such as methodology and triangulation, including reflexivity. Confirmability was, on average, inadequately accounted for, particularly with respect to researchers’ ontology, epistemology, or philosophical perspective and their choice of methodology. Transferability was often poorly developed in terms of triangulation methods and the suitability of the sample for answering the research question/s. Based on these findings, we provide a guideline that may be used to evaluate qualitative research presented in ecology and conservation journals to help secure the role of qualitative research and its application to decision making.