1 resultado para Qualitative interviews
em Ecology and Society
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (3)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (40)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (3)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (48)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (2)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (27)
- Brock University, Canada (16)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (22)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (4)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (6)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (5)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (6)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (37)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (4)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (16)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (35)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (4)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (2)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (53)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (6)
- Memorial University Research Repository (2)
- Open Access Repository of Association for Learning Technology (ALT) (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (13)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (3)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (3)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (75)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (4)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (37)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (35)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (22)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo España (3)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (15)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (14)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (5)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (46)
- Université de Montréal (6)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (38)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (42)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (5)
- University of Washington (7)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (8)
Resumo:
In the mega-diverse country Peru, a resource intensive development model collides with the interest of conserving biodiversity. Peruvian biodiversity experts have developed different lines of argumentation as to how to integrate conservation into the sustainable development of their country. Applying grounded theory, I define five groups of conservation narratives based on the analysis of 72 qualitative interviews with experts working in areas of biodiversity conservation. I have labeled them: biodiversity protectionists, biodiversity traditionalists, biodiversity localists, biodiversity pragmatists, and biodiversity capitalists. These groups are each discussed in connection with what they have to say about biodiversity in relation to human life, valuation and knowledge systems, participation and leadership, substitutability of natural capital, and its predominant political strategy. In a second step, a comparative analysis of the dominant and diverging political perspectives is made. I argue that by deconstructing underlying premises and ideologies, common ground and possible opportunities for collaboration can be identified. Moreover, although the presented results can serve as a discussion scaffold to organize conservation debates in Peru, this example demonstrates how the terms biodiversity and sustainability are operationalized in conservation narratives.