1 resultado para Administrative decisions
em Ecology and Society
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (66)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (5)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (74)
- Brock University, Canada (9)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (40)
- Carolina Law Scholarship Repository (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (37)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (5)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (41)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (9)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (12)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (3)
- Duke University (8)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- FAUBA DIGITAL: Repositorio institucional científico y académico de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (96)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (11)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (7)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (80)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (122)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (26)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (25)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (11)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (24)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (4)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (4)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (11)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (4)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (34)
- University of Connecticut - USA (5)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (1)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
In 2013 the European Commission launched its new green infrastructure strategy to make another attempt to stop and possibly reverse the loss of biodiversity until 2020, by connecting habitats in the wider landscape. This means that conservation would go beyond current practices to include landscapes that are dominated by conventional agriculture, where biodiversity conservation plays a minor role at best. The green infrastructure strategy aims at bottom-up rather than top-down implementation, and suggests including local and regional stakeholders. Therefore, it is important to know which stakeholders influence land-use decisions concerning green infrastructure at the local and regional level. The research presented in this paper served to select stakeholders in preparation for a participatory scenario development process to analyze consequences of different implementation options of the European green infrastructure strategy. We used a mix of qualitative and quantitative social network analysis (SNA) methods to combine actors’ attributes, especially concerning their perceived influence, with structural and relational measures. Further, our analysis provides information on institutional backgrounds and governance settings for green infrastructure and agricultural policy. The investigation started with key informant interviews at the regional level in administrative units responsible for relevant policies and procedures such as regional planners, representatives of federal ministries, and continued at the local level with farmers and other members of the community. The analysis revealed the importance of information flows and regulations but also of social pressure, considerably influencing biodiversity governance with respect to green infrastructure and biodiversity.