1 resultado para policy instruments
em Duke University
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (12)
- Repository Napier (3)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (4)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (53)
- Archive of European Integration (39)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (38)
- Aston University Research Archive (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (4)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (25)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (10)
- Boston University Digital Common (9)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (62)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (15)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (36)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (11)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (18)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (57)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (17)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (9)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (451)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (4)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (7)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (4)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (6)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (1)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
Resumo:
Theory suggests that economic instruments, such as pollution taxes or tradable permits, can provide more efficient technology adoption incentives than conventional regulatory standards. We explore this issue for an important industry undergoing dramatic decreases in allowed pollution - the U.S. petroleum industry's phasedown of lead in gasoline. Using a duration model applied to a panel of refineries from 1971-1995, we find that the pattern of technology adoption is consistent with an economic response to market incentives, plant characteristics, and alternative policies. Importantly, evidence suggests that the tradable permit system used during the phasedown provided incentives for more efficient technology adoption decisions.