1 resultado para electoral propaganda
em Duke University
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (4)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (4)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (4)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (9)
- Archive of European Integration (21)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (10)
- Aston University Research Archive (2)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (26)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (11)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (34)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (1)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (186)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (16)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá, Colombia (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (19)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (14)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (13)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (1)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Funes: Repositorio digital de documentos en Educación Matemática - Colombia (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (15)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (64)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (16)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (19)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (51)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (4)
- Repositorio de la Ciencia y Cultura de El Salvador REDICCES (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (31)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (4)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de El Salvador (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (14)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- RIBERDIS - Repositorio IBERoamericano sobre DIScapacidad - Centro Español de Documentación sobre Discapacidad (CEDD) (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (8)
- Scielo Uruguai (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (17)
- Universidad de Alicante (9)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (46)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (3)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (6)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (8)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (48)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (55)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (6)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Protocorporatist West European countries in which economic interests were collectively organized adopted PR in the first quarter of the twentieth century, whereas liberal countries in which economic interests were not collectively organized did not. Political parties, as Marcus Kreuzer points out, choose electoral systems. So how do economic interests translate into party political incentives to adopt electoral reform? We argue that parties in protocorporatist countries were representative of and closely linked to economic interests. As electoral competition in single member districts increased sharply up to World War I, great difficulties resulted for the representative parties whose leaders were seen as interest committed. They could not credibly compete for votes outside their interest without leadership changes or reductions in interest influence. Proportional representation offered an obvious solution, allowing parties to target their own voters and their organized interest to continue effective influence in the legislature. In each respect, the opposite was true of liberal countries. Data on party preferences strongly confirm this model. (Kreuzer's historical criticisms are largely incorrect, as shown in detail in the online supplementary Appendix.). © 2010 American Political Science Association.