1 resultado para WSIS review process
em Duke University
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Aberdeen University (4)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (10)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (7)
- Aston University Research Archive (55)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- Bioline International (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (25)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (14)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (28)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (17)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (100)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (5)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (13)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (16)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (4)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (14)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (4)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Projetos e Dissertações em Sistemas de Informação e Gestão do Conhecimento (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (75)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (239)
- Repositório Científico da Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (39)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (2)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (3)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (6)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal (5)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (14)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (7)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (15)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (7)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
In April 2008, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) entered into an agreement with Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal to voluntarily undertake a special review of its 2006 Lyme disease guidelines. This agreement ended the Attorney General's investigation into the process by which the guidelines were developed. The IDSA agreed to convene an independent panel to conduct a one-time review of the guidelines. The Review Panel members, vetted by an ombudsman for potential conflicts of interest, reviewed the entirety of the 2006 guidelines, with particular attention to the recommendations devoted to post-Lyme disease syndromes. After multiple meetings, a public hearing, and extensive review of research and other information, the Review Panel concluded that the recommendations contained in the 2006 guidelines were medically and scientifically justified on the basis of all of the available evidence and that no changes to the guidelines were necessary.