1 resultado para Safe Zones
em Duke University
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (4)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (18)
- Archive of European Integration (26)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (4)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (94)
- Boston University Digital Common (13)
- Brock University, Canada (7)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (33)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (27)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (15)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (8)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (6)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (4)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (17)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (5)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (8)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (7)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (284)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (41)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (98)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (3)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (5)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (19)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (13)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (7)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (5)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (11)
- University of Connecticut - USA (5)
- University of Michigan (60)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
Resumo:
Office-based percutaneous revision of a testicular prosthesis has never been reported. A patient received a testicular prosthesis but was dissatisfied with the firmness of the implant. In an office setting, the prosthesis was inflated with additional fluid via a percutaneous approach. Evaluated outcomes included patient satisfaction, prosthesis size, recovery time, and cost savings. The patient was satisfied, with no infection, leak, or complication after more than 1 year of follow-up, at significantly less cost than revision surgery. Percutaneous adjustment of testicular prosthesis fill-volume can be safe, inexpensive, and result in good patient satisfaction.