Mechanisms of Cdc42 Polarization in Yeast

Polarization is important for the function and morphology of many different cell types. The keys regulators of polarity in eukaryotes are the Rho-family GTPases. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which must polarize in order to bud and to mate, the master regulator is the highly conserved Rho GTPase, Cdc42. During polarity establishment, active Cdc42 accumulates at a site on the plasma membrane characterizing the “front” of the cell where the bud will emerge. The orientation of polarization is guided by upstream cues that dictate the site of Cdc42 clustering. However, in the absence of upstream cues, yeast can still polarize in a random direction during symmetry breaking. Symmetry breaking suggests cells possess an autocatalytic polarization mechanism that can amplify stochastic fluctuations of polarity proteins through a positive feedback mechanism.

Two different positive feedback mechanisms have been proposed to polarize Cdc42 in budding yeast. One model posits that Cdc42 activation must be localized to a site at the plasma membrane. Another model posits that Cdc42 delivery must be localized to a particular site at the plasma membrane. Although both mechanisms could work in parallel to polarize Cdc42, it is unclear which mechanism is critical to polarity establishment. We directly tested the predictions of the two positive feedback models using genetics and live microscopy. We found that localized Cdc42 activation is necessary for polarity establishment.

While this explains how active Cdc42 localizes to a particular site at the plasma membrane, it does not address how Cdc42 concentrates at that site. Several different mechanisms have been proposed to concentrate Cdc42. The GDI can extract Cdc42 from membranes and selective mobilize GDP-Cdc42 in the cytoplasm. It was proposed that selectively mobilizing GDP-Cdc42 in combination with local activation could locally concentrate total Cdc42 at the polarity site. Although the GDI is important for rapid Cdc42 accumulation at the polarity site, it is not essential to Cdc42 concentration. It was proposed that delivery of Cdc42 by actin-mediated vesicle can act as a backup pathway to concentrate Cdc42. However, we found no evidence for an actin-dependent concentrating pathway. Live microscopy experiments reveal that prenylated proteins are not restricted to membranes, and can enter the cytoplasm. We found that the GDI-independent concentrating pathway still requires Cdc42 to exchange between the plasma membrane and the cytoplasm, which is supported by computational modeling. In the absence of the GDI, we found that Cdc42 GAP became essential for polarization. We propose that the GAP limits GTP-Cdc42 leak into the cytoplasm, which would be prohibitive to Cdc42 polarization.

Pathogen-Specific Adaptations to Conserved Signaling Pathways in Cryptococcus neoformans

Cryptococcus neoformans is an opportunistic fungal pathogen that causes significant disease worldwide. Even though this fungus has not evolved specifically to cause human disease, it has a remarkable ability to adapt to many different environments within its infected host. C. neoformans adapts by utilizing conserved eukaryotic and fungal-specific signaling pathways to sense and respond to stresses within the host. Upon infection, two of the most significant environmental changes this organism experiences are elevated temperature and high pH.

Conserved Rho and Ras family GTPases are central regulators of thermotolerance in C. neoformans. Many GTPases require prenylation to associate with cellular membranes and function properly. Using molecular genetic techniques, microscopy, and infection models, I demonstrated that the prenyltransferase, geranylgeranyl transferase I (GGTase I) is required for thermotolerance and pathogenesis. Using fluorescence microscopy, I found that only a subset of conserved GGTase I substrates requires this enzyme for membrane localization. Therefore, the C. neoformans GGTase I may recognize its substrate in a slightly different manner than other eukaryotic organisms.

The alkaline response transcription factor, Rim101, is a central regulator of stress-response genes important for adapting to the host environment. In particular, Rim101 regulates cell surface alterations involved in immune avoidance. In other fungi, Rim101 is activated by alkaline pH through a conserved signaling pathway, but this pathway had yet been characterized in C. neoformans. Using molecular genetic techniques, I identified and analyzed the conserved members of the Rim pathway. I found that it was only partially conserved in C. neoformans, missing the components that sense pH and initiate pathway activation. Using a genetic screen, I identified a novel Rim pathway component named Rra1. Structural prediction and genetic epistasis experiments suggest that Rra1 may serve as the Rim pathway pH sensor in C. neoformans and other related basidiomycete fungi.

To explore the relevance of Rim pathway signaling in the interaction of C neoformans with its host, I characterized the Rim101-regulated cell wall changes that prevent immune detection. Using HPLC, enzymatic degradation, and cell wall stains, I found that the rim101Δ mutation resulted in increased cell wall chitin exposure. In vitro co-culture assays demonstrated that increased chitin exposure is associated with enhanced activation of macrophages and dendritic cells. To further test this association, I demonstrated that other mutant strains with increased chitin exposure induce macrophage and dendritic cell responses similar to rim101Δ. We used primary macrophages from mutant mouse lines to demonstrate that members of both the Toll-like receptor and C-type lectin receptor families are involved in detecting strains with increased chitin exposure. Finally, in vivo immunological experiments demonstrated that the rim101Δ strain induced a global inflammatory immune response in infected mouse lungs, expanding upon our previous in vivo rim101Δ studies. These results demonstrate that cell wall organization largely determines how fungal cells are detected by the immune system.

From Polarity to Morphogenesis PAK Behaviors and Mechanism for Bud Sensing in Morphogenesis Checkpoint

Bud formation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a fundamental process for yeast proliferation. Bud emergence is initiated by the polarization of the cytoskeleton, leading to local secretory vesicle delivery and gulcan synthase activity. The master regulator of polarity establishment is a small Rho-family GTPase – Cdc42. Cdc42 forms a clustered patch at the incipient budding site in late G1 and mediates downstream events which lead to bud emergence. Cdc42 promotes morphogenesis via its various effectors. PAKs (p21-activated kinases) are important Cdc42 effectors which mediate actin cytoskeleton polarization and septin filament assembly. The PAKs Cla4 and Ste20 share common binding domains for GTP-Cdc42 and they are partially redundant in function. However, we found that Cla4 and Ste20 behaved differently during the polarization and this depended on their different membrane interaction domains. Also, Cla4 and Ste20 compete for a limited number of binding sites at the polarity patch during bud emergence. These results suggest that PAKs may be differentially regulated during polarity establishment.

Morphogenesis of yeast must be coordinated with the nuclear cycle to enable successful proliferation. Many environmental stresses temporarily disrupt bud formation, and in such circumstances, the morphogenesis checkpoint halts nuclear division until bud formation can resume. Bud emergence is essential for degradation of the mitotic inhibitor, Swe1. Swe1 is localized to the septin cytoskeleton at the bud neck by the Swe1-binding protein Hsl7. Neck localization of Swe1 is required for Swe1 degradation. Although septins form a ring at the presumptive bud site prior to bud emergence, Hsl7 is not recruited to the septins until after bud emergence, suggesting that septins and/or Hsl7 respond to a “bud sensor”. Here we show that recruitment of Hsl7 to the septin ring depends on a combination of two septin-binding kinases: Hsl1 and Elm1. We elucidate which domains of these kinases are needed, and show that artificial targeting of those domains suffices to recruit Hsl7 to septin rings even in unbudded cells. Moreover, recruitment of Elm1 is responsive to bud emergence. Our findings suggest that Elm1 plays a key role in sensing bud emergence.