Roles of CTCF and YY1 in T Cell Receptor Gene Rearrangement And T Cell Development

Diversity of T cell receptors (TCR) and immunoglobulins (Ig) is generated by V(D)J recombination of antigen receptor (AgR) loci. The Tcra-Tcrd locus is of particular interest because it displays a nested organization of Tcrd and Tcra gene segments and V(D)J recombination follows an intricate developmental program to assemble both TCRδ and TCRα repertoires. However, the mechanisms that dictate the developmental regulation of V(D)J recombination of the Tcra-Tcrd locus remain unclear.

We have previously shown that CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) regulates Tcra gene transcription and rearrangement through organizing chromatin looping between CTCF- binding elements (CBEs). This study is one of many showing that CTCF functions as a chromatin organizer and transcriptional regulator genome-wide. However, detailed understanding of the impact of specific CBEs is needed to fully comprehend the biological function of CTCF and how CTCF influences the generation of the TCR repertoire during thymocyte development. Thus, we generated several mouse models with genetically modified CBEs to gain insight into the CTCF-dependent regulation of the Tcra-Tcrd locus. We revealed a CTCF-dependent chromatin interaction network at the Tcra-Tcrd locus in double-negative thymocytes. Disruption of a discrete chromatin loop encompassing Dδ, Jδ and Cδ gene segments allowed a single Vδ segment to frequently contact and rearrange to diversity and joining gene segments and dominate the adult TCRδ repertoire. Disruption of this loop also narrowed the TCRα repertoire, which, we believe, followed as a consequence of the restricted TCRδ repertoire. Hence, a single CTCF-mediated chromatin loop directly regulates TCRδ diversity and indirectly regulates TCRα diversity. In addition, we showed that insertion of an ectopic CBE can modify chromatin interactions and disrupt the rearrangement of particular Vδ gene segments. Finally, we investigated the role of YY1 in early T cell development by conditionally deleting YY1 in developing thymocytes. We found that early ablation of YY1 caused severe developmental defects in the DN compartment due to a dramatic increase in DN thymocyte apoptosis. Furthermore, late ablation of YY1 resulted in increased apoptosis of DP thymocytes and a restricted TCRα repertoire. Mechanistically, we showed that p53 was upregulated in both DN and DP YY1-deficient thymocytes. Eliminating p53 in YY1-deficient thymocytes rescued the survival and developmental defects, indicating that these YY1-dependent defects were p53-mediated. We conclude that YY1 is required to maintain cell viability during thymocyte development by thwarting the accumulation of p53.

Overall, this thesis work has shown that CTCF-dependent looping provides a central framework for lineage- and developmental stage-specific regulation of Tcra-Tcrd gene expression and rearrangements. In addition, we identified YY1 as a novel regulator of thymocyte viability.

Experimental and Theoretical Models to Probe Mechanisms of Biological Charge Flow

Nature is challenged to move charge efficiently over many length scales. From sub-nm to μm distances, electron-transfer proteins orchestrate energy conversion, storage, and release both inside and outside the cell. Uncovering the detailed mechanisms of biological electron-transfer reactions, which are often coupled to bond-breaking and bond-making events, is essential to designing durable, artificial energy conversion systems that mimic the specificity and efficiency of their natural counterparts. Here, we use theoretical modeling of long-distance charge hopping (Chapter 3), synthetic donor-bridge-acceptor molecules (Chapters 4, 5, and 6), and de novo protein design (Chapters 5 and 6) to investigate general principles that govern light-driven and electrochemically driven electron-transfer reactions in biology. We show that fast, μm-distance charge hopping along bacterial nanowires requires closely packed charge carriers with low reorganization energies (Chapter 3); singlet excited-state electronic polarization of supermolecular electron donors can attenuate intersystem crossing yields to lower-energy, oppositely polarized, donor triplet states (Chapter 4); the effective static dielectric constant of a small (~100 residue) de novo designed 4-helical protein bundle can change upon phototriggering an electron transfer event in the protein interior, providing a means to slow the charge-recombination reaction (Chapter 5); and a tightly-packed de novo designed 4-helix protein bundle can drastically alter charge-transfer driving forces of photo-induced amino acid radical formation in the bundle interior, effectively turning off a light-driven oxidation reaction that occurs in organic solvent (Chapter 6). This work leverages unique insights gleaned from proteins designed from scratch that bind synthetic donor-bridge-acceptor molecules that can also be studied in organic solvents, opening new avenues of exploration into the factors critical for protein control of charge flow in biology.

King Democracy: Do Democratic Nations Mitigate Conflict Over Transboundary Freshwater Resources Better Than Other Nations?

The prospect of water wars and conflict over water are ideas that are frequently dramatized in media and also studied by scholars. It is well-established that bona fide wars are not started over water resources, but conflict over water does exist and is not well understood. One would suppose, as scholars often do, that dyads composed of two democratic nations would be the best at mitigating conflict and promoting cooperation over freshwater resources. General conflict research supports that supposition, as does the argument that democracies must be best at avoiding conflicts over resources because they excel at distributing public goods. This study provides empirical evidence showing how interstate dyads composed of various governance types conflict and cooperate over general water and water quantity issues relative to each other. After evaluating the water conflict mitigating ability of democratic-democratic, democratic-autocratic, and autocratic-autocratic dyads, this study found that democracy-autocracy dyads are less likely to cooperate over general water issues and water quantity issues than the other two dyad types. Nothing certain can be said about how the three dyad types compare to each other in terms of likelihood to conflict over water quantity issues. However, two-autocracy dyads seem to be most likely to cooperate over water quantity issues. These findings support the established belief that democratic-autocratic pairs struggle to cooperate while also encouraging greater scrutiny of the belief that democracies must be best at cooperating over water resources.