1 resultado para On-line communities
em Duke University
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (3)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Campus - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (9)
- ARCA - Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (9)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (9)
- Aston University Research Archive (46)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (4)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (34)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (34)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (25)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (36)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (32)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (9)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (77)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (15)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (12)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (11)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (3)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (9)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (60)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (14)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (10)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (39)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (72)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (2)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (7)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (4)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (3)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (56)
- Repositorio Institucional UNISALLE - Colombia (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (5)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (7)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (8)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (27)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (3)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (8)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (25)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Michigan (11)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (14)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Writing plays a central role in the communication of scientific ideas and is therefore a key aspect in researcher education, ultimately determining the success and long-term sustainability of their careers. Despite the growing popularity of e-learning, we are not aware of any existing study comparing on-line vs. traditional classroom-based methods for teaching scientific writing. METHODS: Forty eight participants from a medical, nursing and physiotherapy background from US and Brazil were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 24 per group): An on-line writing workshop group (on-line group), in which participants used virtual communication, google docs and standard writing templates, and a standard writing guidance training (standard group) where participants received standard instruction without the aid of virtual communication and writing templates. Two outcomes, manuscript quality was assessed using the scores obtained in Six subgroup analysis scale as the primary outcome measure, and satisfaction scores with Likert scale were evaluated. To control for observer variability, inter-observer reliability was assessed using Fleiss's kappa. A post-hoc analysis comparing rates of communication between mentors and participants was performed. Nonparametric tests were used to assess intervention efficacy. RESULTS: Excellent inter-observer reliability among three reviewers was found, with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) agreement = 0.931882 and ICC consistency = 0.932485. On-line group had better overall manuscript quality (p = 0.0017, SSQSavg score 75.3 +/- 14.21, ranging from 37 to 94) compared to the standard group (47.27 +/- 14.64, ranging from 20 to 72). Participant satisfaction was higher in the on-line group (4.3 +/- 0.73) compared to the standard group (3.09 +/- 1.11) (p = 0.001). The standard group also had fewer communication events compared to the on-line group (0.91 +/- 0.81 vs. 2.05 +/- 1.23; p = 0.0219). CONCLUSION: Our protocol for on-line scientific writing instruction is better than standard face-to-face instruction in terms of writing quality and student satisfaction. Future studies should evaluate the protocol efficacy in larger longitudinal cohorts involving participants from different languages.