1 resultado para Middle and upper Eocene
em Duke University
Filtro por publicador
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (6)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (11)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (7)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (6)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (23)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (45)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (34)
- Brock University, Canada (7)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (43)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (6)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (16)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (11)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (13)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (8)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (1)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (8)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (302)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (107)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (20)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (41)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade do Minho (4)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (43)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (35)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (33)
- University of Washington (2)
Resumo:
This study explores patients’ needs in rural Thanjavur, southern India through understanding how people with diabetes choose providers and perceive care-seeking experience. To measure perception, the study surveyed people regarding six common barriers to care-seeking behavior, selected from both literature and local expert interview. Ninety-one percent of the sampled population goes to public or private allopathic providers out of the six presented providers. The low socioeconomic group and people with more complications or comorbidities are more likely to go to private allopathic providers. What is more, there is no difference between public and private allopathic providers in patients’ perception of care except for perceived cost. Positive perceptions in both providers are very common except for perceptions in blood-sugar management, distance to facilities, and cost of care. Sixty-six percent of patients perceived their blood-sugar control to fluctuate or have no change versus improved control. Twenty-seven percent of patients perceived the distance to facilities as unreasonable, and sixty-two percent of patients perceived the cost as high for them. The results suggest that cost may affect low socioeconomic people’s choice of care significantly. However, for people in middle and higher socioeconomic groups, cost does not appear to be a major factor. For qualitative text analyses, physician’s behavior and reputation emerge as themes, which require further studies.