1 resultado para Literature review as a topic
em Duke University
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (10)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (38)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (13)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- Bioline International (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (70)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (13)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (27)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (8)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (19)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy - Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (30)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (1)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (59)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (141)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (2)
- Repositorio Academico Digital UANL (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (6)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (7)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (2)
- Repositório Institucional dos Hospitais da Universidade Coimbra (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (99)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (6)
- Scielo España (4)
- Scielo Uruguai (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (5)
- Universidad de Alicante (7)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (6)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (6)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (13)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (3)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (27)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (23)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (9)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (7)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (4)
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Physical activity self-report instruments in the US have largely been developed for and validated in White samples. Despite calls to validate existing instruments in more diverse samples, relatively few instruments have been validated in US Blacks. Emerging evidence suggests that these instruments may have differential validity in Black populations. PURPOSE: This report reviews and evaluates the validity and reliability of self-reported measures of physical activity in Blacks and makes recommendations for future directions. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify published reports with construct or criterion validity evaluated in samples that included Blacks. Studies that reported results separately for Blacks were examined. RESULTS: The review identified 10 instruments validated in nine manuscripts. Criterion validity correlations tended to be low to moderate. No study has compared the validity of multiple instruments in a single sample of Blacks. CONCLUSION: There is a need for efforts validating self-report physical activity instruments in Blacks, particularly those evaluating the relative validity of instruments in a single sample.